Page 1 18CVSanta Clara – Civil
EFS-OZO
K. Lev
STATE BAR N
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
FOR COURT USE ONLY
AARTI REDDY
NAME
TESLA
FIRM NAME:
INC.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton
STREET ADDRESS:
Circle
Fremont
CITY:
TELEPHONE N
(51 0)
E-MAILADDRESS;
ATrORNEY FOR
CA
STATE:
FAX No
602-
ZIP cone:
:
aareddy@tesla.com
(name):
Defendant, Tesla,
Reviewed By: K. Lev
Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Envelope:
STREETADDRESS: 191 North FirstStreet
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITYAND
ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME.
191 North First Street
San Jose,
San Jose
California
CASE N UMBER.
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
VERIFY, INC.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TESLA,
INC.
BCV
JUDICIALOFFICER‘
OTHER:
DEPT‘
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
NOTE:
order
in
to be used to electronically file and submit to the court a proposed order. The proposed order sent
must be in PDF format and must be attached lo this cover sheet. In addition, a version of the proposed
an editable word-processing format must be sent to the court at the same time as this cover sheet and the attached proposed
order
in
PDF
This cover sheet
is
electronically to the court
1.
Name
of the party submitting the proposed order:
TESLA.
2.
format are filed.
INC.
Title of the
proposed order:
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
3.
4.
The proceeding
to
which the proposed order relates
a.
Description of proceeding:
b.
Date and time:
c.
Place:
PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT
is:
Answerto Complaint
September7,
Santa Clara County Superior Court, 191 North
The proposed order was served on
the other parties
in
San Jose,
First Street,
CA 951
the case.
’ V
U
AARTI REDDY
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME)
\_
A
(SHGNRTERE 0F PARTY on m-mRNEV)
PlgaForm Adopted
(or
Mandatory Use
Judwcial Council of Calitornia
EFsiozo [Rev February 1,2017]
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
_
_
_
(Electronlc Flllng)
n
o
Cal Rules of Conn,
www.caurts ca gov
rules 2 252, 3Page 2 EFS-CASE NAME:
VERIFY, INC.
v.
TESLA.
CASE NUMBER:
18CV
INC.
PROOF 0F ELECTRONIC SERVICE
PROPOSED ORDER
1.
am
|
3-
at least
My
18 years old and not a party to this action.
residence or business address
6800 Dumbanon
b.
2.
My
Circle,
Fremont,
electronic service address
is
is
(specify):
CA
(specify):
idelacalzada@tesla.com
eledronically served the Pmposed Order (Cover Sheet) with a proposed order
an editable word-processing format as follows:
|
a.
On (name ofperson
served) (Ifthe person served
is
an
in
be stated):
CA
To
(electronic service
c.
On
(date): 8/29/
address ofperson served):
randall.guritzky@gmail.com
Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with the attached proposed order in PDF format and service of the
an editable word-processing format on additional persons are described in an attachment.
Electronic service of the
proposed order
in
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
Date:
Iris
attached, and a proposed order
Verify Inc.
b.
E
I
Plaintiff,
PDF format
attorney, the party or parties represented should also
Randall S. Guritzky, 1524 North Potrero Avenue. South El Monte,
Attorney for
in
September
6,
EFs—ozo [Rev February
and
correct.
>
(SIGNATURE 0F DECLARANT)
0R PRINT NAME 0F DECLARANT)
1,
true
201
dela Calzada
(TYPE
is
2017}
pRoposED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
(Electronic Filing)
Pugs z orzPage 3
AARTI REDDY (SBN 274889)
E-mail: aareddy@tesla.com
TESLA, INC.
TESLA, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton Circle
Fremont, CA Telephone: (510) 602-Attorneys for Defendant
TESLA, INC.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
VERIFY, INC., California corporation,
Plaintiff,
Case No.: 18CV[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
v.
TESLA, INC.,
Defendant.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV32971Page 4
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall answer or
3 otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on or before September 21, 2018.
DATED: September ___,
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV329713
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
18CV329713
Santa Clara – Civil
EFS-OZO
K. Lev
STATE BAR N0
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
274889
FOR COURT USE ONLY
AARTI REDDY
NAME
TESLA
FIRM NAME:
INC.
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton
STREET ADDRESS:
Circle
Fremont
CITY:
TELEPHONE N0
(51 0)
E-MAILADDRESS;
ATrORNEY FOR
CA
STATE:
FAX No
602-4966
94555
ZIP cone:
:
aareddy@tesla.com
(name):
Defendant, Tesla,
Reviewed By: K. Lev
Inc.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Envelope: 1914145
STREETADDRESS: 191 North FirstStreet
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITYAND
ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME.
191 North First Street
San Jose,
San Jose
California 951
13
CASE N UMBER.
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
1
VERIFY, INC.
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: TESLA,
INC.
BCV32971
3
JUDICIALOFFICER‘
OTHER:
DEPT‘
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
NOTE:
order
in
to be used to electronically file and submit to the court a proposed order. The proposed order sent
must be in PDF format and must be attached lo this cover sheet. In addition, a version of the proposed
an editable word-processing format must be sent to the court at the same time as this cover sheet and the attached proposed
order
in
PDF
This cover sheet
is
electronically to the court
1.
Name
of the party submitting the proposed order:
TESLA.
2.
format are filed.
INC.
Title of the
proposed order:
FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
3.
4.
The proceeding
to
which the proposed order relates
a.
Description of proceeding:
b.
Date and time:
c.
Place:
PLAINTIFF'S
COMPLAINT
is:
Answerto Complaint
September7,2018
Santa Clara County Superior Court, 191 North
The proposed order was served on
the other parties
in
San Jose,
First Street,
CA 951 13
the case.
’ V
U
AARTI REDDY
(TYPE 0R PRINT NAME)
\_
A
4
(SHGNRTERE 0F PARTY on m-mRNEV)
Plga1
Form Adopted
(or
Mandatory Use
Judwcial Council of Calitornia
EFsiozo [Rev February 1,2017]
PROPOSED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
_
_
_
(Electronlc Flllng)
n
o
Cal Rules of Conn,
1312
www.caurts ca gov
rules 2 252, 3
PDF Page 3
EFS-020
CASE NAME:
VERIFY, INC.
v.
TESLA.
CASE NUMBER:
18CV329713
INC.
PROOF 0F ELECTRONIC SERVICE
PROPOSED ORDER
1.
am
|
3-
at least
My
18 years old and not a party to this action.
residence or business address
6800 Dumbanon
b.
2.
My
Circle,
Fremont,
electronic service address
is
is
(specify):
CA 94555
(specify):
idelacalzada@tesla.com
eledronically served the Pmposed Order (Cover Sheet) with a proposed order
an editable word-processing format as follows:
|
a.
On (name ofperson
served) (Ifthe person served
is
an
in
be stated):
CA 91733
To
(electronic service
c.
On
(date): 8/29/2018
address ofperson served):
randall.guritzky@gmail.com
Proposed Order (Cover Sheet) with the attached proposed order in PDF format and service of the
an editable word-processing format on additional persons are described in an attachment.
Electronic service of the
proposed order
in
declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
Date:
Iris
attached, and a proposed order
Verify Inc.
b.
E
I
Plaintiff,
PDF format
attorney, the party or parties represented should also
Randall S. Guritzky, 1524 North Potrero Avenue. South El Monte,
Attorney for
in
September
6,
EFs—ozo [Rev February
and
correct.
>
(SIGNATURE 0F DECLARANT)
0R PRINT NAME 0F DECLARANT)
1,
true
201 8
dela Calzada
(TYPE
is
2017}
pRoposED ORDER (COVER SHEET)
(Electronic Filing)
Pugs z orz
PDF Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
AARTI REDDY (SBN 274889)
E-mail: aareddy@tesla.com
TESLA, INC.
TESLA, INC. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
6800 Dumbarton Circle
Fremont, CA 94555
Telephone: (510) 602-4966
Attorneys for Defendant
TESLA, INC.
7
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
8
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
9
10
VERIFY, INC., California corporation,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
Case No.: 18CV329713
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
v.
TESLA, INC.,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV329713
PDF Page 5
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall answer or
3 otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint on or before September 21, 2018.
4
5
DATED: September ___, 2018
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FOURTH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case No.: 18CV329713