Page 1 STIPULATION - DISCONTINUANCE ( REQUEST TO SO ORDER ): SUPREME
COURT
COUNTY
OF NEW
WALMART
INC.
OF THE
OF NEW
STATE
YORK
YORK
(f/k/a
WAL-MART
STORES,
INC.),
Plaintiff,
- against
ENERGY
TESLA
SOLARCITY
Index
-
No.:
/2019
VOLUNTARY
INC.
OPERATIONS,
WITHOUT
DISCONTINUANCE
(f/k/a
PREJUDICE
CORPORATION),
Defendant.
IS HEREBY
IT
Walmart
Inc.
(f/k/a
Inc.
Operations,
record
in this
.
person
not
.
which
shall
shall
become
hereto
and
a party
and
("Walmart")
by their
Corporation),
to CPLR
prejudice
for
duly
as to Defendant
whom
stipulation
be considered
effective
the
when
to counsel
Walmart's
(a)(2),
a committee
has an interest
This
delivered
Inc.)
by and
AGREED,
between
Plaintiff
Defendant
Tesla
authorized
attorneys
Energy
of
as follows:
Pursuant
incompetent
Stores,
SolarCity
action,
without
person
Wal-Mart
(f/k/a
discontinued
AND
STIPULATED
in the
may
same
such
for
Complaint
Tesla.
has been
subject
No
appointed
matter
of
be executed
in two
as if a single
document
counterparts
the
other
have
party.
party
this
to this
action
is an infant,
or conservatee
and
no
each
of
action.
or more
been
is voluntarily
shall
signed
counterparts,
have
been
by each
executed,
of the
parties
butPage 2 November
DATED:
. 2019
POL K & WARDWELL
! DAVIS
Ja
.
e
ouhandch
P ul - . Mishkin
Lexington
New
(212)
Avenue
New
York,
York
-4000
rouhandeh@davispolk.com
paul.mishkin@davispolk.com
Attorneys
November
DATED:
. 2019
IE N
David
The
Plaintif
TON
LA\
Oakland.
Law
Street,
CA
Firm
Suite
-4900
dshapiro@nortonlaw.com
Attorneys
So Ordered:
J.S.C.
FIRM
Shapiro
Norton
Third
(510)
jor
for Defendant
PC
P
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
STIPULATION - DISCONTINUANCE ( REQUEST TO SO ORDER ): SUPREME
COURT
COUNTY
OF NEW
WALMART
INC.
OF THE
OF NEW
STATE
YORK
YORK
(f/k/a
WAL-MART
STORES,
INC.),
Plaintiff,
- against
ENERGY
TESLA
SOLARCITY
Index
-
No.:
654765/2019
VOLUNTARY
INC.
OPERATIONS,
WITHOUT
DISCONTINUANCE
(f/k/a
PREJUDICE
CORPORATION),
Defendant.
IS HEREBY
IT
Walmart
Inc.
(f/k/a
Inc.
Operations,
record
in this
1.
person
not
2.
which
shall
shall
become
hereto
and
a party
and
("Walmart")
by their
Corporation),
to CPLR
prejudice
for
duly
as to Defendant
whom
stipulation
be considered
effective
the
when
to counsel
Walmart's
3217(a)(2),
a committee
has an interest
This
delivered
Inc.)
by and
AGREED,
between
Plaintiff
Defendant
Tesla
authorized
attorneys
Energy
of
as follows:
Pursuant
incompetent
Stores,
SolarCity
action,
without
person
Wal-Mart
(f/k/a
discontinued
AND
STIPULATED
in the
may
same
such
for
Complaint
Tesla.
has been
subject
No
appointed
matter
of
be executed
in two
as if a single
document
counterparts
the
other
have
party.
party
this
to this
action
is an infant,
or conservatee
and
no
each
of
action.
or more
been
is voluntarily
shall
signed
counterparts,
have
been
by each
executed,
of the
parties
but
PDF Page 3
November
DATED:
4
. 2019
POL K & WARDWELL
! DAVIS
Ja
.
e
ouhandch
P ul - . Mishkin
43
Lexington
New
(212)
Avenue
New
York,
York
10017
450-4000
rouhandeh@davispolk.com
paul.mishkin@davispolk.com
Attorneys
November
DATED:
4
. 2019
IE N
David
The
Plaintif
TON
LA\
Oakland.
Law
Street,
CA
Firm
Suite
94607
906-4900
dshapiro@nortonlaw.com
Attorneys
So Ordered:
J.S.C.
FIRM
Shapiro
Norton
299 Third
(510)
jor
for Defendant
PC
106
P
Back to 
