Parks NiJeer v. McCormack John Document 1, Attachment 1

Superior Court of New Jersey, County of Passaic
Case No. PASL003672-20
Filed November 25, 2020

Complaint with Jury Demand for PAS-L-003672-20 submitted by SEXTON, DANIEL W, DANIEL W SEXTON LLC on behalf of NIJEER PARKS against JOHN E MCCORMACK, ROBERT HUBNER, CITY OF WOODBRIDGE, JOHN DOE 1 - 20, MIDDLESEX COUNTY CORRECTIONS

BackBack to Parks NiJeer v. McCormack John

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

Jump to Document 1 or Attachment 1

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 PAS-L-003672-20 11/25/2020 1:20:13 PM Pg 1 of 1 Trans ID: LCV
Civil Case Information Statement
Case Details: PASSAIC | Civil Part Docket# L-003672-Case Caption: PARKS NIJEER VS MCCORMACK JOHN
Case Type: CIVIL RIGHTS
Case Initiation Date: 11/25/
Document Type: Complaint with Jury Demand
Attorney Name: DANIEL W SEXTON
Jury Demand: YES - 6 JURORS
Firm Name: DANIEL W SEXTON LLC
Is this a professional malpractice case? NO
Address: 329 PACIFIC AVE
Related cases pending: NO
JERSEY CITY NJ
If yes, list docket numbers:
Phone:
Do you anticipate adding any parties (arising out of same
Name of Party: PLAINTIFF : Parks, Nijeer
transaction or occurrence)? YES
Name of Defendant’s Primary Insurance Company
Are sexual abuse claims alleged by: Nijeer Parks? NO
(if known): Unknown
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM CANNOT BE INTRODUCED INTO EVIDENCE
CASE CHARACTERISTICS FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING IF CASE IS APPROPRIATE FOR MEDIATION
Do parties have a current, past, or recurrent relationship? NO
If yes, is that relationship:
Does the statute governing this case provide for payment of fees by the losing party? YES
Use this space to alert the court to any special case characteristics that may warrant individual
management or accelerated disposition:
Do you or your client need any disability accommodations? NO
If yes, please identify the requested accommodation:
Will an interpreter be needed? NO
If yes, for what language:
Please check off each applicable category: Putative Class Action? NO Title 59? NO Consumer Fraud? NO
I certify that confidential personal identifiers have been redacted from documents now submitted to the
court, and will be redacted from all documents submitted in the future in accordance with Rule 1:38-7(b)
11/25/Dated
/s/ DANIEL W SEXTON
Signed
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?