Page 1 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RONALD ADAMS
Plaintiff,
v.
RAND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:07-cv-01874(RCL)
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Third Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, in the above-captioned matter, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED, and it is,
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint be
extended to February 14, 2008.
SO ORDERED.
__________/s/________________________
HON. ROYCE C. LAMBERTH
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:07-cv-01874-RCL
Case 1:07-cv-01874-RCL
Document 9-2
Document 10
Filed 01/31/2008
Filed 02/04/2008
Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RONALD ADAMS
Plaintiff,
v.
RAND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:07-cv-01874(RCL)
ORDER
Upon consideration of Defendant’s Third Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to
Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint, in the above-captioned matter, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED, and it is,
FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s time to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint be
extended to February 14, 2008.
SO ORDERED.
__________/s/________________________
HON. ROYCE C. LAMBERTH
Back to 
