SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED et al Document 29: Errata, Attachment 4

District Of Columbia District Court
Case No. 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ-ZMF
Filed June 8, 2023

ERRATA by SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION re [26] Memorandum. (Attachments: # (1) Errata Attachment A, # (2) Attachment B - Corrected Memorandum, # (3) Attachment C - Redlined Corrected Memorandum, # (4) Atachment D - Exhibit A-83A)(Scarlato, Matthew)

BackBack to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED et al

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

Jump to Document 29 or Attachment 1234

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 EXHIBIT A-83A
Page 2 HO-
Brooks, Brian - Vol.
I.20211213.365944-HQ
12/13/2021 11:21 AM
Full-size Transcript
Prepared by:
HO-Tuesday, June 06, 2023
Page 3
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

In the Matter of:
)

)
BINANCE.US
File No. HO-13865-A
)

WITNESS:
Brian Brooks

PAGES:
1 through
PLACE:
Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street

Washington, D.C.
DATE:
N.E.
Monday, December 13,
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing,
via WebEx, pursuant to notice, at 11:21 a.m.

Diversified Reporting Services, Inc.
(202)467-
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 4
Trading accounts?
A
Digital asset transfers to BAM Trading
accounts?

Q
The company's trading accounts.

A
I -- I can't recall that happening in the time

that I was there.
Q
Okay.
And was anyone at .com required to give

final signoff for digital asset transfers to third

parties?

A
I -- I'm not even sure I understand the

question.

engine, right, that has buyers and sellers, so third

party buyers and sellers would come and that was the

source of liquidity, so we, you know, we were not

filling orders for customers, we were matching customer

orders, so I don't -- I'm not sure I would even know how

to answer the question.

Q
I mean, BAM Trading operated a matching
So were sometimes BAM Trading paid for
services through digital assets?
A
So with only one caveat, I can't -- I can't
recall that ever happening during my tenure.
The one caveat is there was this group of

employees, basically the Shanghai based technology team,

who I learned right at the very end of my tenure, had

apparently received part of their compensation in BNB
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 5
tokens, which were provided by Binance.com, which was a

source of real concern, you know, for the CFO and me

when we learned about that.

consider them to be third parties, that would be the one

caveat.

happening.

Q

Other than that, I'm not aware of that ever
Do you know who gave signoff to -- giving BNB
to these Shanghai based employees?

But -- and so if you
A
That long predated my arrival.
I have no
idea.

Q
Okay.

A
When did who receive the BNB?

Q
When did the Shanghai based employees receive

When did they receive the BNB?
the BNB?
A
Oh, I -- I don't know.
I mean, it was part of

their compensation.

payment or an annual bonus payment or what that was.

I say, that came to my attention two or three weeks

before I left the company, so I -- I mean, I wasn't even

aware of it until the very end.

Q
I don't know if it was a quarterly
As
Were the Shanghai based employees actual
employees of BAM Trading?
A
Well, they were employees of an entity that

had been set up for the purpose, called Boran.

understanding was that at one time they had been
My
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 6
Binance.com employees and then when the Binance.US

separation happened in 2019, the decision was made to

hive off that group of 50 or so people and they would be

allocated full-time to Binance.US, so the question was

if you had a group of Shanghai based people working for

Binance.US, could they actually legally in China work

for Binance.US or did we have to set up a subsidiary

entity that would be where their employment was tied?

And often in multinational corporations that's the way

it works, is that there's a local corporate entity to

which those employees are assigned, so Boran was an

entirely dedicated to Binance.US workforce, paid for by

Binance.US, but housed within this entity called Boran.

Q
Where was Boran incorporated?

A
I don't know.
I don't know.
But I mean, my

assumption, it was a Chinese legal entity is my

assumption, but I -- I don't know.

Q
Was Boran wholly owned by BAM Trading?

A
I'm not sure.

Q
Okay.

A
I don't.

Q
How did you learn about Boran's structure?

A
Well, as I think I've just indicated, I don't
Do you know who would know?

know very much about Boran's structure, other than to

know, you know, sort of like there's Morgan Stanley,
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 7
Morgan Stanley Asia, Morgan Stanley BD Amsterdam, et

cetera, et cetera, only to understand that its role in

the family of companies was like that; it was an

employee holding company set up for purposes of housing

these Chinese employees.

My focus, as you know from the document that

you have, was to migrate that entire function to an

onshore workforce.

enough to complete that task, but you know, that's

Obviously, I wasn't there long
essentially all I know about Boran.
Q
Did you learn about Boran outside of any

attorney/client communications or potential

attorney/client communications?

A
I mean, Boran was a commonly known thing at

BAM Trading, so I certainly talked about it with non-

lawyers, as well as with lawyers.

CFO was aware that there was an entity called Boran.

was the person who brought to my attention this BNB

arrangement, you know, late in my time there.

terms of whatever I would know about the corporate

structure or its rationale, that would have come from

counsel.
I mean, certainly the

Q
Okay.

A
Fifty or 60, something like that.

Q
Okay.
He
But in
How many people work for Boran?
We're going to go back to my original
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 8
question before we went off on talking about Boran here,

you know, which was the question about, you know, who

gives final signoff on certain kinds of business

decisions.

question of like if anyone at .com had to give final

signoff for these activities?

about digital asset transfers.

I'm adjusting the question to ask the
We were just talking
Did anyone at .com have to give final signoff
on new employee hiring decisions?
A
Well, when you say anybody at Binance, there

were certain executives, you know, for example, Manny

Alvarez would be one, I think our chief people officer

would be another, whereas at any company, at a certain

C-Suite level those candidates will meet with the board

in order that the board is comfortable with who the

senior executives were.

CZ and Wei, and later Gin, were members of the

board and so, you know, before those two got hired, they

would have met with CZ and -- and I think Wei.

again, those -- they were not sitting in those

capacities as Binance.com employees; they were sitting

in the capacity as board members of BAM Trading or Bam

Holdings or whatever the entity was.

Q
But
Aside from CZ, Wei, and Gin, would anybody
else at .com have to give final signoff on new employee
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 9
restate the question asked?

that prior testimony.

about informal discussions with CZ and maybe someone

else, but I want -- feel free to ask any questions, but

--

I don't have a memory of
I think he made some comments
THE WITNESS:
Yeah, I'm sorry, I don't

remember talking about informal reporting of BAM Trading

to .com.

meeting that I participated in in late July or early
I mean, the -- you know, there was one board

August of this year.

with CZ, and some out of cycle conversations with me and

CZ, and occasionally, you know, Wei or somebody else.

guess I don't regard that as reporting; that's just

corporate communication.

what you might be looking for.

There were weekly videoconferences
But beyond that, I'm not sure
BY MS. HITCHENS:
Q
Was there ever a time that you learned of some

more, sort of, informal reporting or communications

occurring between BAM Trading personnel and .com that

you hadn't previously been aware of?

I
A
Well, I -- so I would make a distinction

between reporting and communicate, right.
So Binance.US

had a series of dependencies on Binance.com, and so

there were -- there was really constant communication at

the operational level between people on Binance.US and
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 10
people on Binance.com because, for example, there was

going to be a website upgrade and, you know, we copied

and then customized a lot of their code pursuant to a

services agreement that had been entered into at the

time the companies were separated.

ton of integration communication around that.

So there would be a
Or you know, they would be -- I'm trying to

think of good examples.
There would be like a -- like a

hacker or a system's attack of some kind, a DDoS attack

or something, which would make the matching engine

inaccessible or something else would happen, which would

have an effect on us.

interface, that happened every day involving large

numbers of people, again because as I'm sure you know,

under the licensing agreements and the services

agreements, a lot of the operating functions had these

interdependencies.

joined the company and saw that level of their

connection, I said this is going to be a problem and we

need to migrate the technology to full U.S. control for

a whole bunch of reasons.

operational, others being, you know, compliance,

privacy, et cetera.

communication.

That kind of operational
That's one of the reasons why when I
Some of them being
But there was plenty of
So when you said reporting, I was thinking of
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 11
something different.

there was a lot of that.

Q
But in terms of communication,
Was there any sort of informal communication

that you were surprised by during your tenure that you

didn't originally know about and then subsequently

learned?

A
I -- I mean, I don't -- I guess I don't know

how to answer that.
I mean, certainly I was not privy

to all of the communication happening and so I'm sure

that some of it I learned about I would have been

surprised by in the sense that I hadn't previously known

about it and now I was learning about it for the first

time.

You know, the things that rose to the level of

surprise were things like when I learned that there were

Binance.US technology employees who were getting paid in

BNB tokens out of the Binance.com balance sheet.

what I would consider a surprise.

Q
Any other surprises like that?

A
You know, I would say that there were a
That's

handful of occasions where I would learn that, you know,

somebody at the company, sometimes in the U.S. but more

typically in -- in the Boran team, you know, would be

unhappy with some decision I had made or some initiative

we had launched
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 12
and -- and those people might go straight to CZ, and you

know, that -- that obviously was something which when I

learned about it, I would endeavor to shut it down on

the theory that CZ's not the CEO of this company, this

is a U.S. company, you work for me, not him, this has to

stop.
That happened occasionally.

The BNB token to me is -- rises to a different

level of seriousness, but you know, there were things

like that.

Q
Were there any other kinds of surprises,

besides these sort of backdoor type communications you

were describing?

A
Yeah.
I mean, look I -- I couldn't begin to

just pull from my memory random examples of things.

mean, again, it was a -- it was a short tour of duty

marked by, you know, certain pinnacle memories, and you

know, the -- the random things I don't really remember

all that well.

Q
I
Who at BAM Trading U.S. did you learn was
making communications to CZ without your knowledge?
A
It was not -- I will say it was not always

that they were -- I mean, it's happened in both

directions, right, so there would be sometimes that it

came in one direction, sometimes in another.

know, I think Rena Shah had a fairly regular line of
But you
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 13
communication into him, and to other people at

Binance.com.

regularly -- regular communications there.

You know, Chris Robins had fairly
On the inbound side, I think Josh Sroge, our

CFO, got inquiries from CZ fairly frequently, which you

know, in the early days weren't of great concern to me

because I've worked at bigger companies where, you know,

the board chair would reach out to some senior executive

to say, hey, I need some piece of information for

something, so I didn't regard that as particularly

surprising.

direction.

A little bit more surprising in the other
And then of course there were the guys who sat
in Shanghai, who did more of that.
Q
What -- who were the guys in Shanghai that

were making communications to CZ?

names?

A
Yeah, well, I mean there was Frank a lot, and

Gerry somewhat.

Gerry being the product person.

Q
Do you remember their
Okay.
Frank being the technology person,
Do you know who Rena Shah would contact

at .com to have these communications that we've been

talking about as, sort of the without your knowledge?

A
Yeah, I mean, Rena was deeply connected with a
lot of people over there.
I mean, she -- she, I think,
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 14
had actually been there before the COVID lockdowns and

actually had spent time with those people, I think, so

she had a lot of people there that she talked to.

lot.

But CZ was one of them.
Q
Okay.
And what about Christopher Robins, do
you know who he was speaking with at .com?
A
He -- I think his -- his outreach was more

limited, but it did include CZ, and then it also

included a guy named Han, who was a former Latham

A
partner who is CZ's general counsel.
Q
When you say CZ's general counsel, are you
saying he had personal counsel?
A
Well, it's a great question.
I think that Han

-- my understanding is, is he was formerly the

Binance.com general counsel, but I think that their

observance of those kinds of distinctions that you're

making as between personal and corporate might be less

formal than we would make in the United States.

Q
What's an example of that?

A
I'm not sure I can think of a particular

example, but I have an impressionistic memory that there

were times when it was not clear who the client was.

Q
Is that because you would hear maybe, you

know, something said and you didn't know if that was

coming from CZ personally or CZ at .com or from .com?
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 15
Are those sort of the breakdowns of --

A
No.

Q
-- what you're thinking

A
It's when -- no, I mean an example, I think,

would be -- and here I'm -- like this is

impressionistic, okay, based on memory but when we were

doing our venture round, right, there were a number of

issues that related to CZ's personal share ownership of

Binance.US, which was not Binance -- like remember, the

Twitter and Square analogy -- Binance.com did not own a

single share of any entity affiliated with Binance.US at

all, so in that sense the companies were as different as

Twitter and Square are, but there was a person who was

the majority shareholder of both companies, and that

person was CZ.

there was an issue having to do with a note that --

So at a certain point in the fundraise
MR. HOLSCHER:
I'm just going to interrupt, I

apologize.

discussed with counsel -- I don't know if that's where

your answer is going?

If there's any related disclose that was

THE WITNESS:
Yeah, this I don't think was
with counsel.

MR. HOLSCHER:

interrupt.

impinge on a privilege.
Okay.
I apologize to
I just wanted to make sure you didn't
Go ahead.
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 16
THE WITNESS:
That's a totally great -- that's
a great point.

So all I would say is there was an issue that

was being discussed.

between our venture funds and the company having to do

with what's going to happen with this note?

know -- the company was the obligor, on the note CZ was

the obligee, and the question in the negotiation are we

going to buy him out?

out?
This was just a business issue
CZ was, you
Is he going to let us buy him
What's going to happen?

And I don't even remember what any lawyer said

about that, but I do know that the lawyer who showed up

on that was Han.

issue, that was a CZ issue, we -- we were sort of

puzzled as to who the client was.

what his position was, so I'm not disclosing any

communication with counsel, I just know he was the

person who was representing.

And since that was not a Binance.com
Again, I have no idea
So it's just an example of, you know, there

were different layers of -- of that kind of

communication.

Q
Okay.

general?

happened to it?

A
Do you know much about that note in
Like why it was entered into?
Or and what
My --
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 17
MR. HOLSCHER:
learned that from counsel --

THE WITNESS:

MR. HOLSCHER:

I'll counsel you, if you
Yeah, I understand.
-- I don't want you to impinge
upon any corporate attorney/client privilege.

THE WITNESS:
Right.
Yeah.
My knowledge of

it really doesn't have anything to do with that, it just

has to do with the way that the company got

bootstrapped.
So you know, the way companies typically

get started is somebody has to pay for it, so you know,

Hewlett & Packard used their personal checking account

in their mother's garage.

is CZ gave the company its first $10 million to get

launched, and that was done in the form of a note.
What happened with Binance.US

MS. HITCHENS:

BY MS. HITCHENS:

Q
Okay.
So I'm going to ask you about sort of making

distinctions.

distinction when reporting to Changpeng Zhao in their

capacity as a board director, as opposed -- his capacity

as a board director, as opposed to reporting to him in

other roles and capacities?

make a distinction?

A
Did you ever personality make any
Did you ever personally
I mean, I was 100 percent clear in my own mind
that -- I mean, until I quit, obviously, but I was
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 18
percent clear in my own mind that I worked for a board

of directors.

strongly held the conviction that I did not work for

Binance.com, that nobody at Binance.com was my boss, and

that my role was to complete and highlight the corporate

separateness.

myself to be talking to him in his role as board chair

BAM Trading.

working at Fannie Mae I spoke to our board chair all the
I personally, you know, very, very, very
So when I talked to CZ, I considered
The same way that when I was, you know,

time and I considered myself to be talking to the board

chair, not to somebody else but the board chair.

Q
Now, sitting here today and looking back on

your time at the company, do you look back and think,

oh, maybe there were distinctions when I was talking to

him?

A
Possibly not the distinction that you're

thinking about.

certain point was CZ was the CEO of BAM Trading, not me.

What -- what became clear to me at a
That's what became clear at a certain point.
That

wasn't because Binance.com somehow controlled us, but

again, he owns the vast majority of Binance.com so I put

that aside.

It was more of an issue of if I'm Steve

Ballmer and he's Bill Gates, who's really running this

company, right?
So it was not that oh, gee, CZ's acting
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 19
in a different capacity, it is more of do I have the

delegation and autonomy to carry out the mission of a

CEO as outlined in the mission document that you've

seen, right?

did not.

Q
And at a certain point I concluded that I
Can you just elaborate more why you're saying

now sitting here today you look back and think of him as

the CEO of BAM Trading?

A
Yeah.
I mean, look, he's obviously not

formally the CEO of BAM Trading, but in -- in my

judgment, right, there's a distinction between

management and governance.

governance.

means day-to-day execution of a board approved strategy.
The role of the board is
The role of the CEO is management, which

The time that the switch flipped in my mind

was, right, so I had joined the company with knowledge

of issues at the company and a belief that if those

issues could be fixed the company could be very

successful.

so working on those fixes, to the exclusion of almost

everything else.

core foundational things realigned.

And I spent the first, you know, 80 days or
The idea was we're going to get these
That was all fine.
And then at a certain day
I was -- a certain day late in that tenure, I was
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 20
overruled on all of them.

previously agreed and had worked on for 80 days were

suddenly repudiated with no further discussion, and on

that day, I realized, huh, I'm not actually the one

running this company, and the mission that I believe I

signed up for isn't the mission.

realized that, I left.

All of the things that we had
And as soon as I
Q
Well, can you tell me a little bit about that
A
Sure.
day?

I would say -- you know, when I say it

was a day, it was really the space of about eight to
days.

know, which I described previously.

were going through the standard agenda items, how's the

fundraise going?

It began with our regular weekly meeting, you
And you know, we
Who are the board members going to be?
What about the tech migration?
And in this particular

call, the issue was why are doing a tech migration?
And

what I remember about that call is that it was late in

the evening, and I said -- I said the tech migration is

one of the most important risks in this company.

the reason the people believe that, you know, that in

fact the company's not an independent company, that in

fact it's controlled by, you know, somebody sitting in

China.

through all the reasons why we had agreed, and I
It's
This is a foundational strategy, and I went
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 21
reminded him that we had agreed in this document.

the call ended with no good resolution, other than he

wanted to have a follow-up call the next day.

remember this because it was a Saturday was the next

day.

first time I felt we really had a misalignment here.

thought we agreed on what the direction was.
And I
And so I went to bed thinking, yikes, this is the

And
I
So the next morning, we reconvened on a video
again.
I was, you know, now worried.
I had not been

worried the night before until the end of the call, when

I realized we were misaligned.

all smiles again and it was like, you know what, I -- I

trust you.

you need to do.

Saturday morning, it was
I hired you for a reason.
Do what you think
And I thought okay, whew, great.
Then things developed over the coming week,

and then we had that board meeting that I described.

And on the board meeting -- on the board call with these

other people around, including my management team,

that's when the decision was articulated that not only

were not going to migrate the tech stack, but in fact,

we weren't going to do this venture round because he

didn't like the investors.

have any independent board members because he's the

majority shareholder he's entitled to hire and fire all

the board members.
And by the way, we wouldn't
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 22
That was when I said this really isn't going
to work.

Q
This is all occurring during the board meeting

when these statements were made about the complete

change of what you had been expecting from the Saturday

conversation; is that correct?

A
Yes.

Q
Well, you talked about having reached some

kind of agreement before this -- these events that just

transpired.

A
What was that agreement?
Well, so before I joined the company, you

know, the company has a controversial reputation.

has issues.

are here, and I knew that, too, and so my willingness to

commit my time and reputation to this was really

contingent on let's agree that we're going to do a

certain set of things that will address some of the most

important issues, okay, beginning with the question of

who actually controlled this company?

a U.S. company subject to U.S. supervision, operating

within a universe that only allows some products and not

others, et cetera, et cetera, that was right, all of

that.

It
I mean, we know this, that's why you guys
Is this actually
Then there was the technology issue.
have a TikTok problem?
Do we
Is all of the U.S. data
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 23
accessible in China?
Is it possible that China could

take this U.S. company and shut it down by shutting down

our servers or whatever?

creation of a document, I forget what the name of it is,

but I mean, it's one of the documents you shared a

couple of days ago that I assume you're going to show

me.

come if we agree that this is the plan.

the plan, find somebody else.
So that's what led to the
That -- that document was my distillation of I will

And if it's not
That will be fine.
So you know, when I say agreement, that was a

document that I said let's agree on this as our

framework, and if we agree, great.

do fine.

Q
And if not, you'll
You'll find somebody else.
So when did that agreement get reached?
Was

it prior to you starting at the company before you sort

of signed your employment agreement?

A
Yeah.

Q
Okay.

A
Yes.
Oh, yeah.
Yes.
I mean, again, you have it.

whatever the date is.

it was certainly before I joined the company.
The date is

Q
I don't remember what it is, but
But in terms of the response that you got to,

sort of, your list of priorities that you -- it was your

proposal, but then when did you hear yes, we agree with

you, we're behind you on that list?
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 24
A
The -- the matching engine sits in Japan,

okay.

understanding.

Other -- other code sits in Shanghai was my

Q
Okay.
So how did you learn the location of
these servers?

A
I refer to my earlier answer; I had these

lengthy bootcamp sessions with all kinds of people who

were educating me on the business in my first three or

four weeks at the company.

Q
Do you recall any documentation about the
servers specifically and their location?

A
I don't.

Q
Okay.

servers?

So do you know who actually owns the
A
Who owns the physical servers?
I have no
idea.
Q
Okay.
And then who actually pays for the
servers?
A
Well, I mean look, I'm not 100 percent sure

which servers at this point we're even talking about.
I

mean, the servers on which our user data are housed will

be owned by Amazon Web Services and paid for by us under

contract.

owned by some affiliate of Binance Holdings for which we

have access through a services agreement that we pay
The Matchbox matching engine server would be
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 25
for.

In terms of the servers where the, for

example, you know, blockchain integrations for the next

token that we might list might happen, I have no idea

who owns that or how that gets paid for.

Q
In the meetings that you had with potential

investors and BAM Trading, did you recall those

potential investors ever asking about the location of

servers?

A
Not specifically, no.

Q
Did the location or servers ever come up

during those meetings?
A
I don't think so.
I mean, I -- you know,

technology in the meetings I was in wasn't discussed at

level of granularity.

described it to people was, you know, that we had three

significant risk factors.

dependance on Binance.com through this set of contracts;

that we had, you know, one shareholder, you know; and

that we had this board structure, and what I said is the

purpose of the round is to facilitate the fixing of

those problems.

- in this message that we need to migrate the tech

stack, diversify the cap table, and add independent

directors.
You know, the way that I always
We had a strong technology
So it was a very common trope in this -
That was sort of the mantra in these
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 26
meetings.

Q
So for -- you were not the only one from BAM

Trading who was participating in the investor meetings

or even communications.

responsible for providing potential investors with the

details about the location of the servers or you know,

question -- very technical questions?

A
Who at BAM Trading was
Well, again, it's beyond my knowledge that
anybody was even asking those questions, so when you ask

who was responsible for answering those questions, I'm

not sure anyone was because I'm not sure the questions

were asked.

To the extent that they were, you know, there

was a data room that was established that was hosted by

our outside law firm, Skatten, and the two people most

responsible for managing the diligence process were

Chris Robins, our general counsel, and Josh Sroge, our

CFO.

Q
So you were --

A
So for example, that

Q
-- previously --

A
-- that document you showed me -- just to
--

finish the answer, that document that you showed me a

few minutes ago, that would have been prepared likely

jointly by Chris and Josh.
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 27
Q

Thank you.
MR. HOLSCHER:
Kathleen, when you get -- when

you get spot, just take another five minute break when

you get a moment.

Just let us know a good time.
MS. HITCHENS:
Yeah, we'll try and move

through this and then take a break, okay?

Mark.

MR. HOLSCHER:
I was just politely
asking if we could take a break in the next minute or
two, that's all.

Okay.
Thank you,
Next few minutes would be great.
MS. HITCHENS:
Sure, I just wanted to ask one
follow-up question based on what --

MR. HOLSCHER:
Great.

MS. HITCHENS:
-- Brian was saying.

BY MS. HITCHENS:

Q
So which is, you mentioned that .com personnel
managed the offshore servers; is that correct?
A
.com managed the offshore servers?
I -- I

think what I said is I don't have any firsthand

knowledge of exactly what entity managed these servers.

I know that it wasn't us.
So you know, there was the

matching engine in Japan, presumably owned and

administered by some .com entity, but I have no idea

which one, and then there's other servers doing other

functions.
But again, I assume you will have a
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 28
technology deposition but that's not going to be me.

don't know the answer to that.

Q
I
Did any of the Shanghai -- BAM Trading

Shanghai employees and this Boran entity, did they help

manage the offshore servers?

A
I mean, they were software engineers so

managing servers, you know, which is a hardware and IT

function, I - I think would have been beyond their

remit.

Q

These were guys who wrote code.
Did they have access to those servers, do you
know?
A
You mean like physical access to the rooms
where the servers were?
Q
I have no idea.
No, access to be able to load code onto them
and their software and manage the server?
A
Oh, yeah, well I mean, they would have hit

like "control s" and that would have saved something to

something.

guess we all have access to a server because we're

interfacing on computer that runs over a server, but

it's beyond my knowledge as to what that was or where

that piece of hardware sat.

Q
As sort of like, you know, right now, I
But they didn't have, you know, to your

knowledge like higher clearance to sort of work with the

servers in any way?
You know, let's say you and I, you
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 29
know, we don't have the special permissions to, you

know, work with some of our technology but others do?

A

I -MR. HOLSCHER:
Kathleen, I just -- I don't

want to make a formal objection, he's indicated it's a

no, so I hate to have him just speculate on how the --

how the various engineers work with the software and

hardware.
He just doesn't know.
I just worry --

MS. HITCHENS:
Sure.

MR. HOLSCHER:
-- it's not right for him to

speculate.

MS. HITCHENS:

understood.

one more question.

Mark, there's no need to go on,
I want to get us to the bathroom, so just
BY MS. HITCHENS:
Q
Shanghai?
A
You know, where did the Boran employees sit in
Do you know where their offices were located?
I -- I really have no idea.
I'm sure at some

point I might have seen a street address, but I couldn't

tell you.

Q

space?

A
Did BAM Trading pay the lease for their office
I -- I don't know.
I mean, again, I assume

you've seen the services agreement that dictated the

various things that were shared and the accounting
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 30
offsets and the payments and debits and credits that

occurred, that feels to me like a CFO question but I --

I don't know the answer to that.

Q

Okay.
MS. HITCHENS:
So let's go ahead and take a

five minute break.
We'll go off the record now at 1:
p.m., Eastern, and we'll be back at 1:55 p.m., Eastern,

thank you.

(Whereupon, a brief recess was taken.)

MS. HITCHENS:

record, it is 1:56 p.m., Eastern.

took a bathroom break.

Well, let's go back on the
Thank you very much,
And I just want to confirm, Mr. Brooks, that

we've not have any substantive conversations during the

break; is that correct?

THE WITNESS:

MS. HITCHENS:

Yeah.
And apart from your attorney,
you didn't speak with anyone during the break; correct?

THE WITNESS:

MS. HITCHENS:
And is anyone --

MR. HOLSCHER:
It was only --

MS. HITCHENS:
-- physically with you?

MR. HOLSCHER:
-- five minutes.

five minutes.

I'll let you know.
Did not.
It's only
I think you can ask these each time, but
We're -- there's no one else here,
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 31
we're not consulting with anybody.

very quick.

MS. HITCHENS:
But we're also being
Thanks, Mark.
I'm trying to

belt and suspenders with this one.
Just want to make

sure no one's physically in the room with you or can

hear you?

MR. HOLSCHER:
(No response.)

MS. HITCHENS:
Okay.

for you, no one is physically with you, or no one can
hear you; is that correct?

MR. POMMER:

MS. HITCHENS:

BY MS. FILIPP:

And Bob, is that true
Q
That's correct.
Great.
So Mr. Brooks, do you have any understanding

as to what the code that runs Binance.US is?

we've previously discussed with regards to the matching

engine and other software?

understanding of what, sort of, the Binance.US code is?

A
Is it what
Or do you have a different
I -- I literally don't know how to answer that

question.
What the Binance.US code is, it's millions of

lines of computer code.

Q
Okay.

A
I mean, I'm -- I'm not sure what you're

looking for on that.
Q
Okay, that's fine.
In your contacts with
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 32
potential investors, did potential -- did they ever ask

you about who maintains the wallets for the Binance.US

digital assets?

A
Don't recall that.

Q
Okay.
Do you recall if potential investors

ever asked about the Binance Holdings custodial

agreement?

A

I mean, I have no memory of that.
Again, I
mean, you showed me a few minutes ago the diligence

questions that our lead investor put to us.

the ones running the diligence process for the group of

investors.

questions that they asked us.

Q
They were
I mean, those were -- those were the
They asked you questions about the custody
agreement; is that what you're saying?
A
No.
I'm saying that there's a document which

lists all the questions that they asked us, and you just

showed that document to me.

Q
Okay.
Just wanted to clarify, okay.
All

right, so did you ever hear potential investors

explicitly ask about who has access to Binance.US

customer data?

A
I mean, look the only memory I have of that

kind of discussion is, you know, in part because many of

these investors are people I had known for a long time,
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 33
as we opened the pitch by saying, "Let me tell you the

biggest risk in this company.

company is we are highly dependent on a bunch of

technology that sits in Asia.

going to do with the round proceeds is to migrate that

tech to the United States.

factor."

questions, those would be memorialized in the diligence

questionnaire that you've already showed me, and our

The biggest risk in this
One of the things we're
This is a giant risk
So to the extent they asked follow-up
answers were whatever they were.

But to be super clear, it's not like we were

running around representing that this technology is here

in the U.S. and super safe.

is the biggest honking risk factor in this company, is

the dependency on Chinese technology.

succeed unless we migrate it, we said to these guys, and

what we need is your help doing that.

of our two lead investors gave us the outside technology

consultant who helped us develop our plan for migrating

all of the technology.

Q

consultant?

A
What we were saying is this
We will not
And indeed, one
That was Red Point.
So.
Was Red Point the investor who recommended the
Or was Red Point the consultant?
Red Point had a new partner who was the former

CTO of GitHub and is one of the most famous computer

scientists in the world, and he worked with us to help
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 34
can Charles Schwab?

issue is the sort of clearing price, the -- what's the

word that I'm looking for?

an additional trade on an existing piece of software is

basically zero, so you know, it's easy to offer low

trading fees, it's hard to offer high trading fees in my

judgment.

Q
I mean, I don't know.
The real
The -- the marginal cost of
Did BAM Trading offer lower fees than Coinbase
for trading fees?

A
Yes.

Q
And how was BAM Trading able to do that at a

low cost?
A
I -- I think I just answered that question,

because the marginal costs of a marginal trade on a

software platform is zero.

Q
Was BAM Trading paying less for its, sort of,

tech stack than if it had created it in-house by virtue

of being able to license it from .com?

A
Well, it is definitely true that unlike

Coinbase, which had to build its own software, starting

in 2012 from scratch and invest in hundreds and hundreds

of engineers, we were able to basically launch as a

going concern, you know, and license a piece of software

that existed that somebody had built.

always true that when you're able to buy an existing
And it's almost
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 35
thing whose cost has already been fully amortized,

that's going to be a lot cheaper than if you have to

bear the cost of the initial startup expense yourself.

Q
So were the ongoing maintenance costs for the

Binance.US platform sort of less than Coinbase would

pay?

A
No idea.

Q
Okay.

A
I don't know.

Q
Okay.

Who would know?
Do you know if the cost would change
after the migration occurred?

A
The cost would likely go up.

Q
Okay.

A
Well, because the cost of operating one
And why is that?

platform is always lower than the cost of operating two

platforms, even if the two platforms are identical,

right.

United States to be the 50 people operating it.

labor costs are far higher than Chinese costs are, as

I'm sure that you know.

on we would be responsible for our own design decisions,

and that would cost money.

Q
So we would have to hire a team of people in the
U.S.
And you know, from that point
Were the service level agreements going to
sort of continue to exist after the migration?
A
Who can say that never happens, so I don't
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 36
know.

Q

exist?

A

Do you know whether they were contemplated to
I mean, we never got close to that, so I don't
think that discussion was ever had.

Q
Okay.
So basically, under the service level

agreements, it sounds like .com was able to sort of run

with the same personnel the Binance.US platform and then

the .com platform; is that correct?

A
No.
So let me just start over for a second.

So first of all, you've now said service level agreement

several times; service level agreements just refer to

timetables and deliverables.

were.

agreement, not a service level agreement.

create common language here.

That's not what these
These were a services agreement and a licensing
Just to
We had 50 employees that were not Binance.com

employees, these were the Boran people we previously

talked about who were responsible for our technology.

One of the things that they would do is when Binance.com

had a new release of the code base for this or that or

the other, whatever the particular update was that they

might be releasing, it was the Boran employees who then

spend time, you know, essentially copying that code,

making such minor adjustments as were needed for that
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Page 37
code to operate on our U.S., you know, front end

platform, and then would push it out to our customers.

So those were not Binance.com employees doing

that, they were Binance.US employees, Boran employees,

receiving updates from .com and then making those

changes for us.

Q
But those employees, though, did not work on
the matching engine; is that correct?
A
They didn't work on the matching engine,
that's right.
Q
So was .com using the -- you know, has its

matching engine folks, and they were also helping -- not

only helping to support the .com platform, ostensibly,

but those matching engine folks were also supporting the

.US platform?

A
engine.
No.
No, they were supporting the matching
We had a license --

Q
Okay.

A
-- that allowed us to use the matching engine.

Q
Okay.

Thank you for clarifying that.
So during your tenure at BAM Trading, did any

of the following happen: code changes occurred to the

Binance.US platform that were not announced to trading

personnel or to users?

MR. HOLSCHER:
I'm just going to counsel you
[12/13/2021 11:21 AM] Brooks, Brian - Vol. I.20211213.365944-...
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?