NOTICE of Filing of Redlined Version of Proposed Order by BAM MANAGEMENT US HOLDINGS INC., BAM TRADING SERVICES INC. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order (Redlined Version))(Martens, Matthew)
Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ
)
BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC.,
)
BAM MANAGEMENT US HOLDINGS, INC., )
and CHANGPENG ZHAO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
NOTICE OF FILING
Pursuant to the Court’s minute order earlier today, please find enclosed a redline showing
the differences between the consent decree [Dkt # 41-8] submitted by defendants BAM Trading
Services Inc. and BAM Management US Holdings, Inc. (the “BAM Consent Decree”) and the
proposed consent decree [Dkt. #54] submitted by defendants Binance Holdings Limited and
Changpeng Zhao (the “Binance Consent Decree”). As reflected in the redline, the differences
between the two documents are minor and non-substantive.
For the sake of clarity, we have conferred with counsel for all defendants, and can represent
that all defendants agree that the Binance Consent Decree is acceptable and should be treated as
the operative proposed consent decree on behalf of all defendants.Page 2 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Matthew T. Martens
Matthew T. Martens
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC Tel: (202) 663-Fax: (202) 663-Matthew.Martens@wilmerhale.com
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ Document 58 Filed 06/13/23 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ
)
BAM TRADING SERVICES, INC.,
)
BAM MANAGEMENT US HOLDINGS, INC., )
and CHANGPENG ZHAO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
NOTICE OF FILING
Pursuant to the Court’s minute order earlier today, please find enclosed a redline showing
the differences between the consent decree [Dkt # 41-8] submitted by defendants BAM Trading
Services Inc. and BAM Management US Holdings, Inc. (the “BAM Consent Decree”) and the
proposed consent decree [Dkt. #54] submitted by defendants Binance Holdings Limited and
Changpeng Zhao (the “Binance Consent Decree”). As reflected in the redline, the differences
between the two documents are minor and non-substantive.
For the sake of clarity, we have conferred with counsel for all defendants, and can represent
that all defendants agree that the Binance Consent Decree is acceptable and should be treated as
the operative proposed consent decree on behalf of all defendants.
PDF Page 3
Case 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ Document 58 Filed 06/13/23 Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Matthew T. Martens
Matthew T. Martens
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
2100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20037
Tel: (202) 663-6921
Fax: (202) 663-6363
Matthew.Martens@wilmerhale.com
Back to 
