ORDER that the [232] Motion to Seal is denied and the Clerk is requested to unseal docket entry number 233 (see Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 06/14/23. (pmil, )
Page 1 PageID#
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et al.
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. I:23cv0108(LMB/JFA)
V.
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion to seal an unredacted version of
exhibit 1 to the memorandum in support of plaintiffs' motion to compel. (Docket no. 232). As
stated in plaintiffs' memorandum,the motion to seal was filed because the redacted portions of
the exhibit contain information that was designated as confidential by defendant. (Docket no.
234). As required by Local Civil Rule 5, defendant, as the party designating the information as
confidential, filed a response to the motion. (Docket no. 244). In this response defendant states
the redacted information does not disclose competitively sensitive information and defendant
consents to the unsealing of the exhibit. For these reasons, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion to seal is denied and the Clerk is requested to unseal docket
entry number 233.
Entered this 14th day of June, 2023.
./S/.
John F. Anderson
United States Magistrate Judoe
John F. Anderson
United States Magistrate Judge
Alexandria, Virginia
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA Document 265 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 2575
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et al.
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. I:23cv0108(LMB/JFA)
V.
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs' motion to seal an unredacted version of
exhibit 1 to the memorandum in support of plaintiffs' motion to compel. (Docket no. 232). As
stated in plaintiffs' memorandum,the motion to seal was filed because the redacted portions of
the exhibit contain information that was designated as confidential by defendant. (Docket no.
234). As required by Local Civil Rule 5, defendant, as the party designating the information as
confidential, filed a response to the motion. (Docket no. 244). In this response defendant states
the redacted information does not disclose competitively sensitive information and defendant
consents to the unsealing of the exhibit. For these reasons, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion to seal is denied and the Clerk is requested to unseal docket
entry number 233.
Entered this 14th day of June, 2023.
./S/.
John F. Anderson
United States Magistrate Judoe
John F. Anderson
United States Magistrate Judge
Alexandria, Virginia
Back to 
