MOTION Clarify Scheduling Order re [94] Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, by Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Arizona, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Nebraska, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of Rhode Island, State of Tennessee, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, United States of America. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Hearing Transcript Excerpt, # (2) Proposed Order)(Teitelbaum, Aaron)
Page 1 PageID#
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES, et al.,
v.
Plaintiffs,
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Clarify Scheduling Order and its
Memorandum of Law in Support, the Court hereby
FINDS that, to the extent that the jury returns a verdict finding Google liable on any of
Plaintiffs’ claims, a separate equitable remedies proceeding will be held following that verdict.
The Court will determine at that time the scope and timing of any additional fact or expert
discovery related to equitable remedies that may be necessary at that time.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order, ECF No. 94, is hereby clarified to
reflect that it governs the liability and damages phases of this case and that a separate equitable
remedies phase, including any associated evidentiary hearing and additional discovery, will be
set by the Court if and when the jury returns a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs.
DATE: _____________________
____________________________________
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA Document 276-2 Filed 06/30/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 2662
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES, et al.,
v.
Plaintiffs,
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Clarify Scheduling Order and its
Memorandum of Law in Support, the Court hereby
FINDS that, to the extent that the jury returns a verdict finding Google liable on any of
Plaintiffs’ claims, a separate equitable remedies proceeding will be held following that verdict.
The Court will determine at that time the scope and timing of any additional fact or expert
discovery related to equitable remedies that may be necessary at that time.
Accordingly, for good cause shown, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule 16(B) Scheduling Order, ECF No. 94, is hereby clarified to
reflect that it governs the liability and damages phases of this case and that a separate equitable
remedies phase, including any associated evidentiary hearing and additional discovery, will be
set by the Court if and when the jury returns a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs.
DATE: _____________________
____________________________________
Back to 
