United States et al v. Google LLC Document 282: Memorandum in opposition, Attachment 1

Virginia Eastern District Court
Case No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
Filed July 5, 2023

Memorandum in Opposition re [276] MOTION Clarify Scheduling Order re [94] Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, filed by Google LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Reilly, Craig)

BackBack to United States et al v. Google LLC

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

Jump to Document 282 or Attachment 12345

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 PageID#
EXHIBIT
Page 2 PageID#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
---------------------------x
UNITED STATES, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
versus
:
:
GOOGLE LLC,
:
:
Defendant.
:
---------------------------x
Civil Action No.:
1:23-cv-Friday, March 10,
The above-entitled motions hearing was heard before
the Honorable Leonie M. Brinkema, United States District
Judge. This proceeding commenced at 10:10 a.m.
A P P E A R A N C E S:
FOR THE PLAINTIFFS:
GERARD MENE, ESQUIRE
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
2100 Jamieson Avenue
Alexandria, Virginia (703) 299-
AARON TEITELBAUM, ESQUIRE
JULIA WOOD, ESQUIRE
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
ANTITRUST DIVISION
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. (202) 894-
ANDREW FERGUSON, ESQUIRE
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL
202 North Ninth Street
Richmond, Virginia (804) 786-
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
ERIC MAHR, ESQUIRE
TYLER GARRETT, ESQUIRE
FRESHFIELDS BRUCKHAUS DERINGER, LLP
700 13th Street, NW
10th Floor
Washington, D.C. (202) 777-
Stephanie Austin, RPR, CRR USDC/EDVA (571) 298-1649
Page 3 PageID#
third-party witnesses.

example, had 60 third parties; we have had zero.

THE COURT:
The Texas investigation, for
All right.
Well, that's something
you'll have to work out with Judge Anderson.
All right.

MR. MAHR:

Ms. Wood's request.

you denied the motion, a proposal to the Court, and we can

make it to Magistrate Judge Anderson if you'd like, that we

propose for moving forward, and we would like the

Well, I will kind of reinforce
We have been discussing, in the event
opportunity to do that.

THE COURT:
I'll punt that issue to him.
I'll

give him a call today, too, and let him know it's coming.

All right.

MR. MAHR:

THE COURT:
Thank you.
But be mindful of how we operate here.

All right.
Again, this is a problem that, frankly, the

Government's going to have because you chose to be here, and

I'm not joking when I say you need to have your running

shoes on.
All right.

MS. WOOD:

THE COURT:
Understood, Your Honor.
All right.
You know, everything in

life is finite.
We have a finite lifespan, we have all

sorts of limits, and I think the same thing applies to

litigation.

guess what, you aren't going to get 50.
You might like to take 50 depositions but,
You might like to
Stephanie Austin, RPR, CRR USDC/EDVA (571) 298-1649
Page 4 PageID#
have, you know, a year and a half to complete discovery, but

you're not going to get that in this court.

lawyers to have to focus with laser efficiency on what are

the core issues you need to get to resolve a case.

It forces
So having said that, the last matter I want to

just very briefly address is there is this pending motion to

seal.
I just want to put, again, both sides on notice about

this.
I would not normally have granted that motion to seal

if it came to me fresh, because I don't think just the names

alone of people, unless they work for the CIA or something

like that, is something that's appropriate to be sealed.

But Judge Castel did grant that.

example of where if it's a close call, I'm going to go with

what he's already done to reduce this problem with

inefficiencies and with inconsistent rulings.

always be able to agree with him.

I'm unable to because he's a colleague, and he's an

experienced colleague.

that motion.

And, again, this is an
I may not
I would be surprised if
Nevertheless, I am going to grant
But I want both sides to understand that I'm one

of the judges in this court that looks very seriously at my

obligation to make sure that court proceedings are

transparent.

before you come to court, if you want to mark things as

confidential, although I wish it wasn't done as much as it
What you do in the exchange of discovery
Stephanie Austin, RPR, CRR USDC/EDVA (571) 298-1649
Page 5 PageID#
THE COURT:
All right.
Very good.
You're all
free to go.
MS. WOOD:
Thank you, Your Honor.

(Proceedings adjourned at 10:44 a.m.)

----------------------------------

I certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate

transcription of my stenographic notes.

____________________________

Stephanie M. Austin, RPR, CRR
Stephanie Austin, RPR, CRR USDC/EDVA (571) 298-1649
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?