United States et al v. Google LLC Document 282: Memorandum in opposition, Attachment 5

Virginia Eastern District Court
Case No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
Filed July 5, 2023

Memorandum in Opposition re [276] MOTION Clarify Scheduling Order re [94] Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order, filed by Google LLC. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(Reilly, Craig)

BackBack to United States et al v. Google LLC

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

Jump to Document 282 or Attachment 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 PageID#
EXHIBIT 5
Page 2 Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/05/23Page
Page
11 PageID#
Case
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
06/21/1 of2 2ofPageID#
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
STEVES AND SONS, INC.,
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:16cv
JELD-WEN, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER
Having considered the JOINT NOTICE REGARDING PROPOSED SCHEDULE
{ECF No. 262) and the submissions made by counsel on June 14, {ECF Nos. 264 and 265), and it appearing that counsel are now in
agreement upon the schedules for the trials to be held herein on
January 8, 2018 and February 12, 2018, it is hereby ORDERED that the
parties
shall
submit
for
the
Court's
review
a
Consent
Order
respecting the schedule to be followed as outlined in the JOINT NOTICE
REGARDING PROPOSED SCHEDULE
{ECF No.
262)
and
in the
letters
submitted by counsel respecting the agreement on the disputes that
they have had respecting the schedule.
F~rther,
respecting
the
having
considered
conduct
for
the
the
position
of
remedy phase of
the
the
parties
anti trust
component of the first trial {in the event of a verdict in favor of
the plaintiff on the antitrust claim), the parties are advised that
the Court will hold the evidentiary hearing for the remedy issues
immediately after the
first
trial.
However,
the parties have
provided insufficient information respecting how the nature and
Page 3 Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/05/23Page
Page
11 PageID#
Case
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
06/21/2 of3 2ofPageID#
extent of the evidentiary hearing on the equitable and declaratory
remedies and counsel are instructed to file Statements of Position
on that question by July 17, 2017.
Further, there seems to be some miscommunication respecting the
length of the first trial.
In that regard, the parties are advised
that the first trial will be conducted January 8 through 12, and January
through
19,
2018.
Following
receipt
of
the
forthcoming Statements of Position respecting the conduct of the
evidentiary hearing to be held at the end of the first trial, the
Court, after consulting with counsel, will determine exactly how to
conduct that hearing.
Further, counsel are reminded that immediately following the
first trial, the Court has scheduled an Initial Pretrial Conference
in a case that is expected to be tried on Monday, January 22, and the trial of that case is expected to take place on Monday and
Tuesday, January 29 and 30, 2018.
Accordingly, the evidentiary
hearing for the equitable and declaratory remedies likely will occur
during the period January 23 to 25, 2018.
As the Court's schedule
becomes clearer and more defined, minor adjustments in scheduling
may be made.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date: June 21, 2
Page 4 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
1 of4 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42462716
Page 5 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
2 of5 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42472717
Page 6 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
3 of6 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42482718
Page 7 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
4 of7 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42492719
Page 8 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
5 of8 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42502720
Page 9 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
07/13/07/05/23Page
Page
6 of9 6ofPageID#
11 PageID#
42512721
Page 10 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
12/14/07/05/23Page
Page
1 of102 of
PageID#
11 PageID#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
P
U
DEC 14 CLERK U.S. DISIRICT COl.lRT
STEVES AND SONS, INC.,
'RICHMOND. VA
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-545-REP
V.
JELD-WEN, INC.,
Defendant.
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
Having reviewed the Parties' Joint Notice of Proposed Amended Scheduling Order
(ECF No. 711), and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the following
deadlines shall govern the proceedings in this action:
"Event _
Deadline to file conformed discovery
designations
Each party shall file a complete set of proposed
jury instructions
Proposed voir dire to be filed
Previous Deadline
Revise^ Deadline
12/4/
1/15/
12/14/
1/10/
12/14/
1/19/
1/16/
Final Pretriai Conference
12/15/
9:30 a.m. (continuing
9:30 a.m.
to 1/17/18 if
necessary)
Objections to jury instructions to be filed
12/21/
1/18/
Objections to voir dire to be filed
12/21/
1/23/
1/4/
1/25/
9:30 a.m.
9:30 a.m.
Jury Selection
Page 11 Case
Case
1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
3:16-cv-00545-REP Document
Document282-5Filed
Filed
12/14/07/05/23Page
Page
2 of112 of
PageID#
11 PageID#
184992723
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 

Non-Government Works Copyright © 2001-2024 Think Computer Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

About   Privacy   Security   Contact Us

PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?