EXHIBIT (Proposed Order) by Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Arizona, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Illinois, State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Nebraska, State of New Hampshire, State of New Jersey, State of New York, State of North Carolina, State of Rhode Island, State of Tennessee, State of Washington, State of West Virginia, United States of America.. (Teitelbaum, Aaron)
Page 1 PageID#
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES, et al.,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motion to take certain party depositions
after the close of fact discovery. After reviewing the motion, and finding good cause exists, the
motion is GRANTED.
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to take certain Google party
depositions, including of the four Google party witnesses referenced in Footnote 1 of Plaintiffs’
motion, the Google party witness mentioned in the body of the motion, and the Rule 30(b)(6)
deposition of Google, after September 8, 2023, as set forth in Plaintiffs’ motion.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to use those depositions as if they
occurred on or before September 8, 2023.
DATE: _____________________
____________________________________
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA Document 386 Filed 09/01/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID# 5971
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Alexandria Division
UNITED STATES, et al.,
v.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant.
No. 1:23-cv-00108-LMB-JFA
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ motion to take certain party depositions
after the close of fact discovery. After reviewing the motion, and finding good cause exists, the
motion is GRANTED.
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to take certain Google party
depositions, including of the four Google party witnesses referenced in Footnote 1 of Plaintiffs’
motion, the Google party witness mentioned in the body of the motion, and the Rule 30(b)(6)
deposition of Google, after September 8, 2023, as set forth in Plaintiffs’ motion.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs are permitted to use those depositions as if they
occurred on or before September 8, 2023.
DATE: _____________________
____________________________________
Back to 
