SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED et al Document 114: Motion to Compel

District Of Columbia District Court
Case No. 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ-ZMF
Filed September 15, 2023

MOTION to Compel by SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum in Support, # (2) Declaration of Jennifer Farer in Support of SEC Motion to Compel, # (3) Exhibit 1, # (4) Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit 3, # (6) Exhibit 4, # (7) Exhibit 5, # (8) Exhibit 6, # (9) Exhibit 7, # (10) Exhibit 8, # (11) Exhibit 9, # (12) Exhibit 10, # (13) Exhibit 11, # (14) Exhibit 12, # (15) Exhibit 13, # (16) Exhibit 14, # (17) Exhibit 15, # (18) Exhibit 16, # (19) Exhibit 19, # (20) Exhibit 21, # (21) Exhibit 22, # (22) Exhibit 26, # (23) Exhibit 27, # (24) Exhibit 28, # (25) Text of Proposed Order)(zjm)

BackBack to SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED et al

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

Jump to Document 114 or Attachment 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________
)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
)
COMMISSION,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
No. 1:23-cv-01599-ABJ-ZMF
)
BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED,
)
BAM TRADING SERVICES INC.,
)
BAM MANAGEMENT US HOLDINGS
)
INC., AND CHANGPENG ZHAO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
PLAINTIFF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION’S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR OTHER RELIEF
Pursuant to Rule 37(a)(3)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) respectfully moves this Court to compel Defendants BAM
Trading Services Inc. and BAM Management US Holdings Inc. (collectively, “BAM”) to
produce discovery and related relief in accordance with the proposed order attached hereto. The
grounds for the SEC’s Motion are set forth in the SEC’s supporting memorandum and
accompanying exhibits that are attached hereto. The SEC’s memorandum also contains the
SEC’s opposition to BAM’s related motion for a protective order, Dkt. No. 95.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(m), the SEC states that counsel for BAM has informed the
SEC that it opposes this Motion.
Page 2 Dated: August 28,
Respectfully submitted,
/s/Jennifer L. Farer
Matthew Scarlato (D.C. Bar No. 484124)
Jennifer L. Farer (D.C. Bar No. 1013915)
J. Emmett Murphy
David A. Nasse (D.C. Bar No. 1002567)
Jorge G. Tenreiro
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(202) 551-5072 (Farer)
farerj@sec.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?