Custom Printing of Willmar, Inc. v. International Paper CO. et al Document 22: Waiver of Service Executed

Filed September 15, 2004

BackBack to Custom Printing of Willmar, Inc. v. International Paper CO. et al, Massachusetts District Court Case No. 1:04-cv-11583-GAO

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Madison International Sales Company waiver sent on 8/6/04. (Pease, Peter)

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.

  Formatted Text Tab Overlap Raw Text Right End
Page 1 Op
Case 1:04-cv-11583-GAO Document 22 _ Filed 09/15/2004 Page 1 of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Custom Printing of Willmar, Inc.,
on behalf of itself and all others
similarly situated, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 04-11583
Plaintiff,
WAIVER OF SERVICE OF
Vs. SUMMONS
International Paper Co; MeadWestvaco Corp.;
Norske Skogindustrier ASA; Norske Skog
North America LLC; Norske Skog (USA), Inc.;
Norke Skog (USA) Holdings, Inc.; Norske Skog
Canada Limited; Norske Skog Canada (USA),
Inc.; Stora Enso Oyj; Stora Enso North America
Corporation; Sappi Limited; S.D. Warren
Company; Metsdlitto Group; Metsiilitto
Cooperative; M-real Corporation; M-real USA
Corp.; UPM-Kymmene Corporation; Myllykoski
Corporation; Madison International Sales
Company; and Bowater, Inc.
Defendants.
Soran? emer” ee me Smee mee See Se” nee” Smee Se” ee ee Smee Se See” Some Sone! Sg” Sean meee mgr Se

TO: Jonathan Troupp, representing Madison International Sales Company
I acknowledge receipt of your request that I waive service of a summons in the action of
Custom Printing of Willmar, Inc., et al. v. International Paper Co., et al., which is case number-11583-GAO in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. I have also
received a copy of the complaint in the action, two copies of this instrument, and a means by
which I can return the signed waiver to you without cost to me.
I agree to save the cost of service of a summons and an additional copy of the complaint
in this lawsuit by not requiring that the entity on whose behalf I am acting be served with judicial
process in the manner provided by FRCP Rule 4.
My client will retain all defenses or objections to the lawsuit or to the jurisdiction or
venue of the court, except for objections based on a defect in the summons or in the service of
the summons.
Page 2 Case 1:04-cv-11583-GAO Document 22 _ Filed 09/15/2004 Page 2of2
I understand that a judgment may be entered against me (or the party on whose behalf I
am acting) if an answer or motion under Rule 12 is not served upon you within 60 days after
August 3, 2004.
Date Si gnature at


; 4

Printed/typed name:
. * g 2 gg “
in my capacity as: Lane"
v
f

Lidnnad
Avtagae
of (entity name): “ -4¢“er Jn Teed
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?