United States v. Manuel Rojas-Luviano
Appeal Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. 12-20462

Tags No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Request Update Request UpdateSpaceE-Mail Alert Get E-Mail Alerts

  Text Tab Overlap Citations (348) Tab Overlap Cited By (0) Right End
Case: 12-20462 Document: 00512419763 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2013
No. 12-20462
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v. MANUEL ROJAS-LUVIANO, also known as Manuel Luviano Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas Luviano, also known as Manuel Luviano-Rojas, also known as Manuel Rojas,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-79-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Manuel Rojas-Luviano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rojas-Luviano has not filed a response and has been removed from the United States. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-20462 Document: 00512419763 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 12-20462
reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED in part as frivolous, see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2, and in part as moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir. 2007).

[End Page 2]

Statistics

This case has been viewed 183 times.

No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
Space
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
 
PlainSite
Sign Up
Need Password Help?