Proof Of Service Re San Francisco Community College District's Cross
Complaint Against California State Teachers Retirement System Filed By
Cross Complainant
San Francisco Community College District (erroneously Sued As
City College Of San Francisco)
Cross Complaint Filed By Cross Complainant
San Francisco Community College District (erroneously Sued As
City College Of San Francisco)
As To Cross Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Roes 1-10
35
Filed: 5/6/2013, Entered: 5/6/2013
Answer To Cross Complaint Filed By Cross Defendant
San Francisco Community College District (erroneously Sued As
City College Of San Francisco)
Law And Motion 302, Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show
Cause Re: Alternative Writ Of Mandate - In Light Of The Ruling
Granting Preliminary Injunction, The Request Re: Alternative Writ Of
Mandate Is Denied. (prevailing Party To Prepare A Form Of Order Which
Complies With Crc 3.1312, Approval As To Form.) Judge: Marla J.
Miller; Clerk: Gina Gonzales; Court Reporter: Anthony C. Vaughn, Csr #
6185
Law And Motion 302, Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show
Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction - The Preliminary Injunction Is
Granted. This Will Extend The Tro & Require Calsters To Continue
Paying Petitioners' Pensions Until The Administrative Process Is
Complete. Ccsf, City College Is Not An Indispensable Party. There Is
Merit In The Due Process Claim. There Is Also Enough Of A Record To
Conclude That Each Of The Petitioner Needs The Money To Survive. There
Is No Showing That This Preliminary Injunction Will Prejudice
Calsters. No Other Relief Is Granted As Petitioners Have Not Exhausted
Their Administrative Remedies Yet. If A Party Wants A Statement Of
Decision, That Party Should Prepare One & Submit It To The Court.
(prevailing Party To Prepare A Form Of Order Which Complies With Crc
3.1312, Approval As To Form.) Judge: Marla J. Miller; Clerk: Gina
Gonzales; Court Reporter: Anthony C. Vaughn, Csr # 6185
Pos Of Response To Osc And Oppos. To Mtn For Preliminary Injunction
And Dec.'s Filed By Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Declaration Of Tom Gong In Support Of Response To Osc And Oppos. To
Pltf's Mtn For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Declaration Of John Weech In Support Of Response To Osc And Oppos. To
Pltf's Mtn For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Declaration Of Peggy Plett In Support Of Response To Osc And Oppos. To
Pltf's Mtn For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Declaration Of Peter Haley In Support Of Response To Osc And Oppos. To
Pltf's Mtn For Preliminary Injunction Filed By Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Response To Osc And Oppos. To Mtn For Preliminary Injunction Filed By
Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Added To Calendar For Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show
Cause Re: Alternative Writ Of Mandate
Hearing Set For Jan-30-2013 At 09:30 Am In Dept 302
Added To Calendar For Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show
Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
Hearing Set For Jan-30-2013 At 09:30 Am In Dept 302
Order Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show Cause Re:
Preliminary Injunction
5
Filed: 12/17/2012, Entered: 12/17/2012
Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Petition For Writ
Of Mandate And Complaint For Declaratory And Injunctive Relief Filed
By Plaintiff
Keenan, James
Olchowy, Martha
Blomquist, James
Contract/warranty, Complaint And Petition For Writ Of Mandate Filed By
Plaintiff
Keenan, James
Olchowy, Martha
Blomquist, James
As To Defendant
California State Teachers' Retirement System
Teachers Retirement Board Of California State Teachers
Retirement System
Does I-v
Summons Issued, Judicial Council Civil Case Cover Sheet Filed
Case Management Conference Scheduled For May-15-2013
Proof Of Service Due On Feb-13-2013
Case Management Statement Due On Apr-30-2013
Date: 5/15/2013, Time: 10:30:00, Status: None
Case Management Conference
Off Calendar Apr-30-2013 Off Calendar
Date: 1/30/2013, Time: 09:30:00, Status: None
Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show Cause Re: Alternative Writ Of Mandate
Off Calendar Jan-30-2013 Text Ruling
Mini Minutes:
Appearances:
Susan M. Carson, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, Tel. 415.703.5580, For Defendant;
David P. Clisham, Esq. Of Clisham & Sortor, Tel. 415.291.0855, For Petitioners;
Justine L. Clisham, Esq. Of Clisham & Sortor, Tel. 415.291.0855, For Petitioners;
Phil Crawford, Esq. Of The Law Office Of Phil Crawford, Tel. 408.313.3212, For Petitioners.
Ruling:
Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show Cause Re: Alternative Writ Of Mandate - A R G U E D.
At The Conclusion Of Argument, The Court Ruled As Follows:
In Light Of The Ruling Granting Preliminary Injunction, The Request Re: Alternative Writ Of Mandate Is Denied.
(prevailing Party To Prepare A Form Of Order Which Complies With Crc 3.1312, Approval As To Form.)
Judge: Marla J. Miller; Clerk: Gina Gonzales; Court Reporter: Anthony C. Vaughn, Csr # 6185
Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction
Off Calendar Jan-30-2013 Text Ruling
Mini Minutes:
Appearances:
Susan M. Carson, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, Tel. 415.703.5580, For Defendant;
David P. Clisham, Esq. Of Clisham & Sortor, Tel. 415.291.0855, For Petitioners;
Justine L. Clisham, Esq. Of Clisham & Sortor, Tel. 415.291.0855, For Petitioners;
Phil Crawford, Esq. Of The Law Office Of Phil Crawford, Tel. 408.313.3212, For Petitioners.
Ruling:
Temporary Restraining Order And Order To Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction - A R G U E D.
At The Conclusion Of Argument, The Court Ruled As Follows:
The Preliminary Injunction Is Granted.
This Will Extend The Tro & Require Calsters To Continue Paying Petitioners' Pensions Until The Administrative Process Is Complete.
Ccsf, City College Is Not An Indispensable Party.
There Is Merit In The Due Process Claim.
There Is Also Enough Of A Record To Conclude That Each Of The Petitioner Needs The Money To Survive.
There Is No Showing That This Preliminary Injunction Will Prejudice Calsters.
No Other Relief Is Granted As Petitioners Have Not Exhausted Their Administrative Remedies Yet