Vote Up
Vote Down

Implement President Obama's five principles for tax reform and improve the current progressive income tax system by alleviating income and payroll tax burdens on the middle and lower classes and by increasing income and payroll taxes on the top brack

1,497 Views / Posted by Anonymous

Share with Reddit Share with Reddit

Given the nature of the progressive tax system, it would be beneficial to government revenues and the economy for policies to be implemented that increase taxes on incomes falling into the upper quintiles and to decrease taxes on middle and lower class quintiles. This adjustment in policy would allow for everyone to pay their “fair share” as modern methods of taxation require. This is proposal is needed given the current economic conditions, and concurrently provides the compelling force necessary to motivate citizens to render taxes, in proportionality to their wealth.
Supporter: Lisa Matulevicz
Opponents: None

Laws and Regulations, United States Constitution
Article 1, Section 8 (Changes)

Current LawChangesProposed Law

Court Cases This issue has not been linked to any court cases yet.
News This issue has not been linked to any news articles yet.
Companies and Organizations This issue has not been linked to any companies or organizations yet.
    No comments have been added yet. Sign in to post a comment.
    Problems Add Add a Problem
    Vote Up
    Vote Down
    Problem Americans have seen a massive redistribution of wealth over the last forty years with the country surrendering nearly a quarter of the nation’s yearly income to the top 1% of Americans. Furthermore of all the new financial wealth created by the Am
    Loopholes in the tax system and botched economic policies such as the one implemented by former President Ronald Reagan and supported by subsequent Republican administrations that rely on a supply-side, trickle-down theory of wealth are certainly not the sole cause of the current economic quagmire in which the U.S. finds itself. However, such policies and negligence have expanded financial mismanagement, deepened inequality, and increased government indebtedness thus expediting the downward spiral of the U.S. economy.
    To grasp the societal changes that have resulted from such policies one has only to look to the increase in the excess of corporate remuneration. United for a Fair Economy reported that in the 1970’s CEOs made $35 to every $1 that their employees made. Today S&P CEOs average $10.5 million each, which puts the CEO to average worker ratio at $344 to $1. This gap is amplified even more when considering that the average CEO to minimum wage worker pay is $866 to $1 comparatively. Data on 50 private equity and hedge fund groups intensifies this disparity by reporting average pay for managers of these groups of $588 million, more than 19,000 times more than the average American wage earner. What this reveals is a disappearance of wealth from the hands of the middle-class, with the majority of money being concentrated into the hands of a few, the top 5%.
    If we look at figures even closer we will find that the pace of the growing disparity in wealth is increasing at an alarming rate. The Center for American Progress reports that during the 1st four years of the Bush Recovery Plan (2002-2006) the $863 Billion in Household income growth was divided as follows: Top 1% of Households, (amount distributed: $4.2 Million per household) in total $626 Billion, Next 9% of Households (amount distributed: $14,651 per household) in total $195 Billion, Bottom 90% of Households ($304 per household) in total $41 Billion. These statistics illustrate the division of capital in disproportionate amounts among the population with the majority of wealth being concentrated in the possession of a few incredibly wealthy individuals.
    Data gathered since the Bush Tax Cuts and presented in a 2005 article by Lee Price of the Economic Policy Institute made public the actual effects of tax policies that were supposed to stimulate economic activity on all fronts. In actuality precisely the opposite took place. The American economy suffered greatly in comparison to the average of past business cycles showing significant losses in the areas of GDP, Payroll Jobs, Personal Income, Consumption, and Equipment & Software. Along with the failure of the tax cuts to deliver the promised economic boom was the more apparent lack of revenue collected by lowered taxation. From fiscal year 2001 to 2005 the combined cost of tax cuts by the government had reached $260 billion an amount that Price argues would have helped enormously in balancing the deficit of the previous year. The effects of an ill-conceived taxation policy have wrought economic disaster and increased budget deficits. If the current economic situation is to be addressed and corrected then change in U.S. tax policy will have to take place.
    Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
    Issues Laws Cases Pro Articles Firms Entities
    Sign Up
    Need Password Help?