The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.
December 31, 2010 Edition · Export XML
6/23/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-01959
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
5/30/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-01722
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al
5/27/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-01674-RDM
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
4/11/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-01107
SUSMAN GODFREY LLP v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
4/4/2025
Montana District Court
4:25-cv-00026-JTJ
Webber et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
3/24/2025
New York Southern District Court
1:25-cv-02412-NRB
Chung v. Trump et al
3/18/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00799-RCL
RFE/RL, INC. v. LAKE et al
3/15/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00766-JEB
J.G.G. et al v. TRUMP et al
3/11/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00716-BAH
PERKINS COIE LLP v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
2/21/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00532-TNM
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS v. BUDOWICH et al
2/19/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00471-LLA
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE et al v. TRUMP et al
2/18/2025
Florida Middle District Court
8:25-cv-00411-CEH-AAS
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. et al v. De Moraes
2/13/2025
Maryland District Court
8:25-cv-00462-TDC
Does 1-26 v. Musk et al.
2/10/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00385-ABJ
DELLINGER v. BESSENT et al
2/7/2025
California Northern District Court
3:25-cv-01350-WHO
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al v. Donald J. Trump et al
2/7/2025
Washington Western District Court
2:25-cv-00244-LK
State of Washington et al v. Department of Justice et al
2/4/2025
Massachusetts District Court
1:25-cv-10276-GAO
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO et al v. EZELL et al
1/30/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00287-TJK
OCA - ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN ADVOCATES v. RUBIO et al
1/30/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00286-RCL
DOE et al v. MCHENRY et al
1/28/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00240
TALBOTT et al v. TRUMP et al
1/28/2025
Maryland District Court
8:25-cv-00260-PX
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. Trump et al
1/26/2025
Massachusetts District Court
1:25-cv-10195-GAO
Moe v. Trump, President of the United States et al
1/24/2025
Illinois Northern District Court
1:25-cv-00868
Organized Communities Against Deportations et al v. BENJAMINE HUFFMAN et al
1/21/2025
Massachusetts District Court
1:25-cv-10139-LTS
State of New Jersey et al v. Trump et al
1/21/2025
Washington Western District Court
2:25-cv-00127-JCC
State of Washington et al v. Trump et al
1/20/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00164-JMC
PUBLIC CITIZEN, INC. et al v. TRUMP et al
1/14/2025
District Of Columbia District Court
1:25-cv-00105-SLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MUSK
9/10/2024
New York Southern District Court
1:24-cv-06848-KPF
Richard v. Combs et al
8/16/2024
Illinois Northern District Court
1:24-cv-07344
Bakhtiari v. Mays et al
7/8/2024
California Northern District Court
3:24-cv-04123-RFL
Hutchinson v. Musk et al
6/14/2024
California Northern District Court
3:24-cv-03621-MMC
Cavaliere v. Tesla, Inc.
6/13/2024
New York Southern District Court
1:24-cv-04770-LTS
Howard v. Combs et al
2/27/2024
California Northern District Court
3:24-cv-01190-VC
A.S. v. OpenAI et al
2/16/2024
New York Southern District Court
1:24-cv-01204-AS
Bensky et al v. Indyke et al
1/10/2024
Massachusetts District Court
1:24-cv-10092-IT
Kestenbaum et al v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
9/6/2023
Maine District Court
1:23-cv-00335-JAW
CASTRO v. SECRETARY OF STATE, SHENNA BELLOWS et al
9/5/2023
California Northern District Court
3:23-cv-04557-VC
T. et al v. OpenAI LP et al
6/23/2023
California Northern District Court
3:23-cv-03108-JD
Pauly v. Becker
5/30/2023
California Southern District Court
3:23-cv-01010-CAB-AHG
Toussaint v. Tesla
5/12/2023
California Northern District Court
4:23-cv-02321-JST
Bui-Ford et al v. Tesla, Inc.
5/5/2023
California Northern District Court
3:23-cv-02217-SI
Anoke et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
4/26/2023
Florida Northern District Court
4:23-cv-00163-MW-MAF
Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. v. DESANTIS et al
3/24/2023
Massachusetts District Court
1:23-cv-10647-DJC
Oliveira v. Ellison-Lopes
3/22/2023
New Mexico District Court
1:23-cv-00242-SCY
Johnson v. Tesla, Inc.
3/20/2023
New York Southern District Court
1:23-cv-02351-UA
Craft v. Musk et al
3/6/2023
California Northern District Court
3:23-cv-01004-LB
Ferguson v. Coinbase Inc. California
1/12/2023
New York Southern District Court
1:23-cv-00287-ER
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Genesis Global Capital, LLC et al
1/4/2023
New York Southern District Court
1:23-cv-00038-JHR
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. Credit Acceptance Corporation
12/27/2022
New York Southern District Court
1:22-cv-10904-JSR
Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
12/12/2022
New York Northern District Court
1:22-cv-01337-FJS-CFH
VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. James
Source
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930; Pub. L. 85–554, §1, July 25, 1958, 72 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 94–574, §2, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2721; Pub. L. 96–486, §2(a), Dec. 1, 1980, 94 Stat. 2369.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 1, 36 Stat. 1091; May 14, 1934, ch. 283, §1, 48 Stat. 775; Aug. 21, 1937, ch. 726, §1, 50 Stat. 738; Apr. 20, 1940, ch. 117, 54 Stat. 143).
Jurisdiction of federal questions arising under other sections of this chapter is not dependent upon the amount in controversy. (See annotations under former section 41 of title 28, U.S.C.A., and 35 C.J.S., p. 833 et seq., §§30–43. See, also, reviser's note under section 1332 of this title.)
Words “wherein the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs,†were added to conform to rulings of the Supreme Court. See construction of provision relating to jurisdictional amount requirement in cases involving a Federal question in United States v. Sayward, 16 S.Ct. 371, 160 U.S. 493, 40 L.Ed. 508; Fishback v. Western Union Tel. Co., 16 S.Ct. 506, 161 U.S. 96, 40 L.Ed. 630; and Halt v. Indiana Manufacturing Co., 1900, 20 S.Ct. 272, 176 U.S. 68, 44 L.Ed. 374.
Words “all civil actions†were substituted for “all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity†to conform with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words “or treaties†were substituted for “or treaties made, or which shall be made under their authority,†for purposes of brevity.
The remaining provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1332, 1341, 1342, 1345, 1354, and 1359 of this title.
Changes were made in arrangement and phraseology.
Amendments
1980—Pub. L. 96–486 struck out “; amount in controversy; costs†in section catchline, struck out minimum amount in controversy requirement of $10,000 for original jurisdiction in federal question cases which necessitated striking the exception to such required minimum amount that authorized original jurisdiction in actions brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in an official capacity, struck out provision authorizing the district court except where express provision therefore was made in a federal statute to deny costs to a plaintiff and in fact impose such costs upon such plaintiff where plaintiff was adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the required amount in controversy, computed without regard to set-off or counterclaim and exclusive of interests and costs, and struck out existing subsection designations.
1976—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94–574 struck out $10,000 jurisdictional amount where action is brought against the United States, any agency thereof, or any officer or employee thereof in his official capacity.
1958—Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted “$10,000†for “$3,000â€, and added subsec. (b).
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment; Applicability
Section 4 of Pub. L. 96–486 provided: “This Act [amending this section and section 2072 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] shall apply to any civil action pending on the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 1, 1980].â€
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Section 3 of Pub. L. 85–554 provided that: “This Act [amending this section and sections 1332 and 1345 of this title] shall apply only in the case of actions commenced after the date of the enactment of this Act [July 25, 1958].â€
Show more ▼
Sorry, this feature requires a PlainSite Pro or Pro Se subscription.