Laws and Regulations, United States Code
29 U.S.C. § 2601: Title 29, Chapter 28, Section 2601
§2601. Findings and purposes
 |
No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some. |
Select any part of the text below to annotate and link to court cases. (Remember to sign in to receive credit for your contributions.)
Congress finds that--
(1) the number of single-parent households and two-parent households in which the single parent or both parents work is increasing significantly;
(2) it is important for the development of children and the family unit that fathers and mothers be able to participate in early childrearing and the care of family members who have serious health conditions;
(3) the lack of employment policies to accommodate working parents can force individuals to choose between job security and parenting;
(4) there is inadequate job security for employees who have serious health conditions that prevent them from working for temporary periods;
(5) due to the nature of the roles of men and women in our society, the primary responsibility for family caretaking often falls on women, and such responsibility affects the working lives of women more than it affects the working lives of men; and
(6) employment standards that apply to one gender only have serious potential for encouraging employers to discriminate against employees and applicants for employment who are of that gender.
It is the purpose of this Act--
(1) to balance the demands of the workplace with the needs of families, to promote the stability and economic security of families, and to promote national interests in preserving family integrity;
(2) to entitle employees to take reasonable leave for medical reasons, for the birth or adoption of a child, and for the care of a child, spouse, or parent who has a serious health condition;
(3) to accomplish the purposes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) in a manner that accommodates the legitimate interests of employers;
(4) to accomplish the purposes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) in a manner that, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, minimizes the potential for employment discrimination on the basis of sex by ensuring generally that leave is available for eligible medical reasons (including maternity-related disability) and for compelling family reasons, on a gender-neutral basis; and
(5) to promote the goal of equal employment opportunity for women and men, pursuant to such clause.
|
|
2/20/2018 |
Virginia Western District Court |
3:18-cv-00011 |
Hollis v. Charlottesville Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center, LLC |
|
|
|
2/20/2018 |
Colorado District Court |
1:18-cv-00408 |
O'Shea v. University of Colorado Board of Regents, The |
|
|
|
2/16/2018 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:18-cv-00708 |
Roark v. G2 Secure Staff, LLC |
|
|
|
2/15/2018 |
Maryland District Court |
1:18-cv-00477 |
Terry v. Amazon.com.dedc, LLC |
|
|
|
2/6/2018 |
New York Southern District Court |
1:18-cv-01039 |
Tucker v. Schiff Hardin LLP |
|
|
|
2/2/2018 |
Alabama Northern District Court |
2:18-cv-00191 |
Navarro v. Costco Wholesale Corporation |
|
|
|
2/1/2018 |
Maryland District Court |
8:18-cv-00322 |
Zepeda v. Panera LLC |
|
|
|
2/1/2018 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:18-cv-00499 |
Christian v. CoWorx Personnel, LLC |
|
|
|
1/31/2018 |
Florida Middle District Court |
8:18-cv-00249 |
Guerra v. HIT Promotional Products, Inc. |
|
|
|
1/31/2018 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:18-cv-00489 |
Smith v. Signature Payroll Services, LLC |
|
|
|
1/31/2018 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
2:18-cv-00013 |
Smith v. Habersham County, Georgia |
|
|
|
1/29/2018 |
South Carolina District Court |
3:18-cv-00238 |
Unknown Case Title |
|
|
|
1/22/2018 |
Florida Middle District Court |
8:18-cv-00169 |
Pope v. Jarrett Ford, Inc. |
|
|
|
1/17/2018 |
Indiana Southern District Court |
1:18-cv-00142 |
HEINKE v. THE ARC OF GREATER BOONE COUNTY, INC. |
|
|
|
1/17/2018 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
2:18-cv-00005 |
Smallwood v. The Longstreet Clinic, P.C. |
|
|
|
1/11/2018 |
New York Southern District Court |
1:18-cv-00245 |
Michel v. New York City Transit Authority |
|
|
|
1/11/2018 |
South Carolina District Court |
5:18-cv-00107 |
Lee v. Methodist Oaks, The |
|
|
|
1/8/2018 |
Wisconsin Eastern District Court |
2:18-cv-00036 |
Arriola v. Cardinal Stritch University |
|
|
|
1/8/2018 |
Florida Middle District Court |
6:18-cv-00029 |
Vertus v. Crown Linen, LLC |
|
|
|
1/8/2018 |
New York Southern District Court |
1:18-cv-00119 |
Delorenzo v. Spartan Security Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
1/2/2018 |
Florida Middle District Court |
8:17-cv-03120 |
Horsey v. Packaging Corporation of America |
|
|
|
12/29/2017 |
Minnesota District Court |
0:17-cv-05591 |
Avritt v. Mains'l Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
12/27/2017 |
Texas Southern District Court |
4:17-cv-03891 |
Oldenstam v. Donnelley Financial, LLC |
|
|
|
12/19/2017 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
2:17-cv-00283 |
Boyd v. Prime-Pak Foods, Inc. |
|
|
|
12/12/2017 |
Pennsylvania Western District Court |
2:17-cv-01608 |
BARBIAUX v. SOLDIER ON, INC. |
|
|
|
12/11/2017 |
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-05545 |
KRITZ v. A&E CONSTRUCTION, CO. |
|
|
|
12/8/2017 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:17-cv-05030 |
Holmes v. Gwinnett Automotive Company |
|
|
|
12/7/2017 |
Florida Middle District Court |
8:17-cv-02942 |
Buabeng v. Omnicare, Inc. |
|
|
|
12/7/2017 |
Missouri Western District Court |
2:17-cv-04244 |
Woodruff v. Jefferson City Area Young Men's Christian Association |
|
|
|
12/5/2017 |
Texas Western District Court |
3:17-cv-00372 |
Boyer v. AT&T, Inc. |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
Tennessee Middle District Court |
3:17-cv-01523 |
Wigington v. Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority |
|
|
|
12/4/2017 |
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-05419 |
THORNTON v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. |
|
|
|
11/29/2017 |
Texas Southern District Court |
4:17-cv-03635 |
Beraki v. CVS RX Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
11/28/2017 |
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-05334 |
FORTUNE v. VECTOR SECURITY, INC. |
|
|
|
11/27/2017 |
New York Southern District Court |
1:17-cv-09265 |
Brown v. PMK-BNC, Inc. |
|
|
|
11/27/2017 |
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-05303 |
BEIRD v. LINCOLN UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION |
|
|
|
11/20/2017 |
Kentucky Western District Court |
3:17-cv-00694 |
Holcomb v. Safelite Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
11/13/2017 |
Alabama Middle District Court |
2:17-cv-00777 |
Johnson v. Kumi Manufacturing Alabama, LLC (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2) |
|
|
|
11/8/2017 |
Connecticut District Court |
3:17-cv-01880 |
Terry v. Marconi |
|
|
|
11/7/2017 |
Tennessee Middle District Court |
3:17-cv-01438 |
Stull v. Saint Thomas Medical Partners d/b/a Saint Thomas Heart |
|
|
|
11/7/2017 |
Pennsylvania Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-04978 |
ORTIZ v. ABINGTON RELDAN MANAGEMENT, INC. |
|
|
|
11/3/2017 |
California Central District Court |
2:17-cv-08051 |
Adam Brown v. Whole Foods Market California, Inc |
|
|
|
11/3/2017 |
Florida Middle District Court |
8:17-cv-02646 |
Kiernan v. Mainsail Lodging & Development LLC |
|
|
|
10/30/2017 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:17-cv-04329 |
Hines v. Sage Software, Inc. |
|
|
|
10/30/2017 |
Louisiana Eastern District Court |
2:17-cv-11469 |
Stevenson v. Arnona Restaurant Group, LLC |
|
|
|
10/27/2017 |
Minnesota District Court |
0:17-cv-04900 |
Chanthraphone v. Starkey Laboratories, Inc. |
|
|
|
10/25/2017 |
Pennsylvania Western District Court |
1:17-cv-00283 |
STAFFORD v. NORTHWEST TRI -COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT |
|
|
|
10/24/2017 |
Colorado District Court |
1:17-cv-02544 |
Tran v. Halcon Resources Corporation |
|
|
|
10/23/2017 |
New York Southern District Court |
1:17-cv-08145 |
Ferreira v. T2 Computing Inc. |
|
|
|
10/19/2017 |
Georgia Northern District Court |
1:17-cv-04157 |
Ledbetter v. IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. |
|
|
Source
(Pub. L. 103–3, §2, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 6.)
References in Text
This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 103–3, Feb. 5, 1993, 107 Stat. 6, known as the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, which enacted this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, amended section 2105 of Title 5, and enacted provisions set out as notes below. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.
Effective Date
Section 405 title IV of Pub. L. 103–3 provided that:
“(a) Title III.—Title III [enacting subchapter II of this chapter] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Feb. 5, 1993].
“(b) Other Titles.—
“(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), titles I, II, and V and this title [enacting subchapters I and III of this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and amending section 2105 of Title 5] shall take effect 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.
“(2) Collective bargaining agreements.—In the case of a collective bargaining agreement in effect on the effective date prescribed by paragraph (1), title I [enacting subchapter I of this chapter] shall apply on the earlier of—
“(A) the date of the termination of such agreement; or
“(B) the date that occurs 12 months after the date of the enactment of this Act.â€
Short Title of 2009 Amendment
Pub. L. 111–119, §1, Dec. 21, 2009, 123 Stat. 3476, provided that: “This Act [amending sections 2611 and 2612 of this title] may be cited as the ‘Airline Flight Crew Technical Corrections Act’.â€
Short Title
Section 1(a) of Pub. L. 103–3 provided that: “This Act [enacting this chapter, sections 60m and 60n of Title 2, The Congress, and sections 6381 to 6387 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, amending section 2105 of Title 5, and enacting provisions set out above] may be cited as the ‘Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993’.â€
 |
Sorry, this feature requires a PlainSite Pro or Pro Se subscription.
|
|
|