This opinion is part of a group with 2 total opinions. Viewing opinion 2 of 2.

MARK ROSE, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF IMPERIAL COUNTY Et Al., Respondents

California Court of Appeal, Case No. Docket No. 5426.

80 Cal. App. 739252 P. 7651927 Cal. App. LEXIS 928

Filed: January 21, 1927 | Thompson, Craig | Author: CRAIG, J., Dissenting.

I dissent, mainly because in my opinion, officers of an irrigation district are not subject to a proceeding of this nature.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 19, 1927.

Font Options

Opinion Details

Court

California Court of Appeal

Case Number

Docket No. 5426.

Filed Date

January 21, 1927

Format

XML

Lead Author

CRAIG, J., Dissenting.

Judges

Thompson, Craig

Posture

APPLICATION for a Writ of Prohibition to prevent the Superior Court of Imperial County from further proceeding in an action for removal of a director of an irrigation district. Writ denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Related Opinions

Opinion 1 (Thompson)

Opinion 2 (CRAIG, J., Dissenting.)

Additional Information

Attorneys

Chas. L. Childers, A. C. Finney and D. B. Roberts for Petitioner., Harry W. Horton and Kendall B. Perkins for Respondent.

Statistics

This opinion has been viewed 0 times.

Issues Laws Cases News Firms Entities Pro

AI text generation	None
AI document summarization	None
AI-augmented search	None
AI-generated images	None
AI chat or Q&A interface	Linkable via MCP
Third party AI contribution in government documents	Possible