 |
Aaron Greenspan
This morning, Alexandra Merz quote-tweeted a screenshot of my response that some account had posted in reply to her. 44 people responded. Then, for some reason, she deleted it.
In addition, as I expected would happen, Elon Musk has weighed in on Twitter to express his agreement with her video assailing Chancellor McCormick.
Why do I care? Because Chancellor McCormick is one of the only judges I've come across who is patient enough and detail-oriented enough to wade through thousands of pages of facts and lies and reach the correct conclusion most of the time, even when the parties involved are wealthy beyond imagining. And because I am genuinely concerned—and I know I'm not the only one—that the mob scrutiny Musk and his followers gin up is actually dangerous.
Meanwhile, it's obvious that Merz's and now Musk's purported concerns are much ado about nothing. McCormick addressed the insane notion that a deposition transcript was modified herself. She was extremely patient and clear. I'm not sure what more anyone could ask for. You can read the case documents here:
 CONF ORD 7.25.2023/Kevin Kulak v. Itshak ("Itzik") On, Court of Chancery of Delaware Case No. 2023-0011-KSJM
Once again, this case has absolutely nothing to do with Tesla, Elon Musk, or any issue related to them. Zero. It's just a random case.
Merz's followers think she should call the police and get a restraining order against me because I politely suggested via e-mail that she should take down her video in which she makes false and totally misleading statements. Things are pretty broken when the reflexive answer to a reasonable e-mail is police involvement, but sure, whatever, go ahead. You do you. I'm sure the police will get right on it, because, after all, according to Omar Qazi, I am an "extremely dangerous criminal." What was that about "free speech?"
Lunatics.
|
|
January 12, 2025 at 11:54 AM EST •  Reply |
|
Aaron Greenspan
Tesla retail shareholder and cult follower Alexandra Merz has posted a misleading and outrageously stupid diatribe on Twitter falsely accusing Chancellor McCormick—whom Musk despises—of corruption. Merz has absolutely no idea what she's talking about.
In her ten-minute tirade, she argues that a totally unrelated case involving a small business deal gone wrong proves that the Chancellor is corrupt because a court reporter made some errors in a transcript and no one bothered to file an errata. The Chancellor suggested that they should do that.
Merz also confused the Chancellor pointing out that she lacks federal criminal authority, which is an obviously true statement, with the Chancellor making some sort of criminal threat. This is just dumb.
It gets better. Merz is upset that Chancellor McCormick didn't automatically dismiss a legitimate lawsuit against individuals who allegedly engaged in wrongdoing—even though the docket shows that those individuals, whom she supports, never filed a motion to dismiss. So how would that work?
And Merz blames Chancellor McCormick for not giving proper instructions on how those individuals should have filed an appeal, even though that's not her job. Judges don't give legal advice. One could argue that they should, but that would require massive legal reform, and isn't her fault.
The real problem is that by banning any rational discussion on Twitter (while, of course, championing "free speech"), Musk has created a breeding ground for stupendous idiots like Merz and foreign state actors to seed conspiracy theories which can then spread without ever being checked.
Needless to say, there is absolutely no evidence that Chancellor McCormick is corrupt—only evidence that Alexandra Merz is a crackpot cult member with zero legal acumen who is upset that her pointless, time-wasting motions in the Court of Chancery have gone absolutely nowhere. |
|
January 11, 2025 at 10:19 PM EST • Reply |
|
Aaron Greenspan
This morning, Alexandra Merz quote-tweeted a screenshot of my response that some account had posted in reply to her. 44 people responded. Then, for some reason, she deleted it.
In addition, as I expected would happen, Elon Musk has weighed in on Twitter to express his agreement with her video assailing Chancellor McCormick.
Why do I care? Because Chancellor McCormick is one of the only judges I've come across who is patient enough and detail-oriented enough to wade through thousands of pages of facts and lies and reach the correct conclusion most of the time, even when the parties involved are wealthy beyond imagining. And because I am genuinely concerned—and I know I'm not the only one—that the mob scrutiny Musk and his followers gin up is actually dangerous.
Meanwhile, it's obvious that Merz's and now Musk's purported concerns are much ado about nothing. McCormick addressed the insane notion that a deposition transcript was modified herself. She was extremely patient and clear. I'm not sure what more anyone could ask for. You can read the case documents here:
CONF ORD 7.25.2023/Kevin Kulak v. Itshak ("Itzik") On, Court of Chancery of Delaware Case No. 2023-0011-KSJM
Once again, this case has absolutely nothing to do with Tesla, Elon Musk, or any issue related to them. Zero. It's just a random case.
Merz's followers think she should call the police and get a restraining order against me because I politely suggested via e-mail that she should take down her video in which she makes false and totally misleading statements. Things are pretty broken when the reflexive answer to a reasonable e-mail is police involvement, but sure, whatever, go ahead. You do you. I'm sure the police will get right on it, because, after all, according to Omar Qazi, I am an "extremely dangerous criminal." What was that about "free speech?"
Lunatics.
|
|
January 12, 2025 at 11:54 AM EST • Reply |
Get E-Mail Alerts
