ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying as moot [2] Motion for Electronic Case Filing; denying as moot [5] Motion for Exemption from Local Rule 3-9(b); granting [13] defendants' Motion to Continue Initial Case Management Conference. Initial case management conference set for 1/31/2012, 1:30 PM. Related deadlines adjusted. Each party to file consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 1/24/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2012)
No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Page 1 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
*E-FILED 01-05-2012*
3
4
5
7
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
6
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
No. C11-05496 HRL
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT VENCHIARUTTI, in his official
capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the
California Department of Financial Institutions;
WILLIAM HARAF, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the California Department of
Financial Institutions; TRACI STEVENS, in her
official capacity as Acting Secretary of the
California Business, Transportation and Housing
Agency; JACOB A. APPELSMITH, in his
official capacity as Senior Advisor to the
Governor of the State of California; EDMUND
G. BROWN, in his official capacity as Governor
of the State of California; and KAMALA
HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney
General of the State of California,
ORDER (1) DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE
FILING; (2) DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
LOCAL RULE 3-9(b); AND (3)
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[Re: Docket Nos. 2, 5, 13]
Defendants.
/
23
24
Counsel having filed an appearance for plaintiff Think Computer Corporation, Aaron
25
Greenspan’s motions for permission to e-file and for exemption from Civil Local Rule 3-9 are
26
denied as moot.
27
28
Defendants’ motion to continue the initial case management conference set for January
10, 2012 (and associated deadlines) is granted as follows:
January 11, 2012:
Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement,
ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADRPage 2 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page2 of 3
1
Certification signed by parties and counsel; and file either a
Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of need for ADR Phone
Conference
2
3
January 24, 2012:
4
5
January 31, 2012,
1:30 p.m.:
Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or
state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, and file Case Management
Statement
Initial Case Management Conference
6
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
Additionally, no later than January 24, 2012, each party must file either (1) a
8
Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed
9
Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Civ.
10
L.R. 73-1. The forms are available from the Clerk of the Court and on the court’s website at
11
http://cand.uscourts.gov. Each party is free to decline to proceed before a magistrate judge and
12
to request reassignment to a district judge without adverse substantive consequences. FED. R.
13
CIV. P. 73(b)(2).
14
SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: January 5, 2012
16
HOWARD R. LLOYD
17
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2Page 3 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page3 of 3
1
5:11-cv-05496-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Michael Brooks Carroll
carroll_law@sbcglobal.net
3
Peter Keller Southworth
Peter.southworth@doj.ca.gov, Julie.gomez@doj.ca.gov
4
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
PDF Page 1
PlainSite Cover Page
PDF Page 2
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
*E-FILED 01-05-2012*
3
4
5
7
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
6
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
No. C11-05496 HRL
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT VENCHIARUTTI, in his official
capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the
California Department of Financial Institutions;
WILLIAM HARAF, in his official capacity as
Commissioner of the California Department of
Financial Institutions; TRACI STEVENS, in her
official capacity as Acting Secretary of the
California Business, Transportation and Housing
Agency; JACOB A. APPELSMITH, in his
official capacity as Senior Advisor to the
Governor of the State of California; EDMUND
G. BROWN, in his official capacity as Governor
of the State of California; and KAMALA
HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney
General of the State of California,
ORDER (1) DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC CASE
FILING; (2) DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
LOCAL RULE 3-9(b); AND (3)
GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[Re: Docket Nos. 2, 5, 13]
Defendants.
/
23
24
Counsel having filed an appearance for plaintiff Think Computer Corporation, Aaron
25
Greenspan’s motions for permission to e-file and for exemption from Civil Local Rule 3-9 are
26
denied as moot.
27
28
Defendants’ motion to continue the initial case management conference set for January
10, 2012 (and associated deadlines) is granted as follows:
January 11, 2012:
Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement,
ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR
PDF Page 3
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page2 of 3
1
Certification signed by parties and counsel; and file either a
Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of need for ADR Phone
Conference
2
3
January 24, 2012:
4
5
January 31, 2012,
1:30 p.m.:
Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or
state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, and file Case Management
Statement
Initial Case Management Conference
6
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
Additionally, no later than January 24, 2012, each party must file either (1) a
8
Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed
9
Before a Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Civ.
10
L.R. 73-1. The forms are available from the Clerk of the Court and on the court’s website at
11
http://cand.uscourts.gov. Each party is free to decline to proceed before a magistrate judge and
12
to request reassignment to a district judge without adverse substantive consequences. FED. R.
13
CIV. P. 73(b)(2).
14
SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: January 5, 2012
16
HOWARD R. LLOYD
17
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PDF Page 4
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document14 Filed01/05/12 Page3 of 3
1
5:11-cv-05496-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Michael Brooks Carroll
carroll_law@sbcglobal.net
3
Peter Keller Southworth
Peter.southworth@doj.ca.gov, Julie.gomez@doj.ca.gov
4
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Third party AI contribution in government documents
Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Think Computer Corporation does not generate, alter, annotate, or summarize documents using artificial intelligence. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.
Back to 
