Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Response to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Exhibits A-B re [25] filed by Think Computer Corporation. (Carroll, Michael) (Filed on 2/29/2012) Modified on 3/1/2012 (bw, COURT STAFF).
No tags have been applied so far. Sign in to add some.
Page 1 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650 |
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
lI
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page1 of 11
Michael Brooks Carrol! (Bar #54904)
Kevin A. Flautt (Bar #257892)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 788-7600
Facsimile: (415) 421-7379
carroll law@sbeglobal.net
Attomeys for Plaintiff
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Jose Division
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION, ) Case No, CV11-05496-HRL
Plaintiff, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN
SUPPORT OF RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION
v. TO MOTION TO DISMISS
ROBERT VENCHIARUTTL, in his official
capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the
California Department of Financial
Institutions; WILLIAM HARATF, in his officia’
capacity as Commissioner of the California
Department of Financial Instibitions; TRACI
STEVENS, in her official capacity as Acting
Secretary of the California Business,
Transportation and Housing Agency: JACOB
A. APPELSMITH, in his official capacity as
Senior Advisor to the Governor of the STATE
OF California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. in
his official capacity as Governor of the State of
California; and KAMALA HARRIS, in her
official capacity as Attorney General of the
State of California,
Before the Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
Hearing Date: March 27, 2012
Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 2
Complaint Filed: November 14, 2011
First Amended Complaint Filed: January 31, 2012
Trial Date: None Set
Detendanis.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRLPage 2 306 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
1]
12
13
i4
1S
16
i7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page2 of 11
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 et seq., Plaintiff Think Computer Corporation hereby
requests that this Court take judicial notice of the following exhibits, made up of the statutory, regulatory
and other official instructions and requirements of the Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”)
the “FAQ” (frequently asked questions) section as displayed on such administrative agency’s website as
set out below, an official Report issued by the Department of the Treasure concerning the USA Patriot Act,
and certain Rulings of the Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(FinCEN). See United States v. Ritchie (9" Cir. 2003) 342 F.3d 903, 909 (“Courts may take judicial notice
of some public records, including those records and reports of administrative bodies”), Further Plaintiff
requests that this Court take judicial notice of such official documents and publications available on the
DFI and FinCEN websites. “It is not uncommon for courts to take judicial notice of factual information
found on the world wide web." (citations). “This is particularly true of information on government
agency websites, which have often been treated as proper subjects for judicial notice.” (citations
omitted), Paralyzed Veterans of Am. v. McPherson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69542, *16-18 (N.D. Cal.
Sept. 8, 2008). , s
Accordingly, and pursuant to such authority, Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of
the following exhibits, true and correct copies of which are attached hereto:
Exhibit A: Statutory, regulatory and other official instructions and requirements of the
Department of Financial Institutions;
Exhibit B: Printout of “FAQ” (frequently asked questions) section as displayed on DFT’S
website;
Exhibit C; “A Report To The Congress In Accordance With Section 359 Of The Uniting And
StF engthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept And Obstruct
Terrorism Act Of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT)” ” submitted by the Secretary of the US.S Department
of the Treasury November 2002;
Exhibit D: Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN
2009-R001;
Exhibit fh; Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN |
2008-R005;
Exhibit F: Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN
2003-8.
» '
: 2 *
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRLPage 3 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
1
i2
i4
15
16
“17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page3 of 11
Dated: February 28, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS
CARROLL
By: 4/ Kevin A. Flautt
Kevin A. Flautt, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff THINK COMPUTER
CORPORATION
}
3 +
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRLPage 4 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page4 of 11
, EXHIBIT APage 5 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page5d of 11
EXHIBIT A
Minimum Requirements for Licensure and Fees Established by the
California Money Transmission Act
CA Financial Code
(2012 Re-Numbered) Clause Requirement
§ 2032(b) “An applicant for licensure under this chapter shall pay to the
commissioner a nonrefundable fee of five thousand dollars
($5,000).”
§ 2037(d) “A licensee that sells or issues payment instruments or stored
value shall maintain securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company in an amount of no less than five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000) or 50 percent of the average daily
outstanding payment instrument and stored value obligations
in California, whichever is greater; provided that such amount
shall not be more than two million dollars ($2,000 ,000).”
§ 2037(e) “A licensee that engages in receiving money for transmission
shall maintain securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company in an amount greater than the average daily
outstanding obligations for money received for transmission in
California, provided that such amount shall not be less than
two hundred fifty thousand doliars ($250,000) nor more than
seven million dollars ($7,000,000).”
§ 2037 “The amount of securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company required to be maintained by subdivisions (d) and (e)
are cumulative,”
§ 2038(a) “The fee for filing an application for a license is five
thousand dollars ($5,000), as provided in subdivision (b) of
7 Section 2032.”
§ 2038(b) “The fee for filing an application for approval to acquire
control of a licensee is three thousand five hundred dollars
($3,500).
§ 2038(c) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, a licensee
fee of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500).”
§ 2038(d) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, one
hundred twenty-five dollars ($125) for each licensee branch
office in this state.”
§ 2038(e) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, twenty-five
dollars ($25) for each agent branch office in this state,”
§ 2038) “Whenever the commissioner examines a licensee or any
agent of a licensee, the licensee shall pay, within 10 days after
receipt of a statement from the commissioner, a fee of seventy-
five dollars ($75) per hour for each examiner engaged in the
examination plus, if it is necessary for any examiner engaged
in the examination to travel outside this state, the travel
expenses of the examiner.”
| : EXHIBIT_PS__Page 6 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page6 of 11
§ 2038(g)
§ 2038(h)
§ 2040
§ 2042(a)
“Whenever the commissioner examines an applicant, the
applicant shall pay, within 10 days after receipt of a statement
from the commissioner, a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75) per
hour for each examiner engaged in the examination plus, if it
is necessary for any examiner engaged in the examination to
travel outside this state, the travel expenses of the examiner.”
“Each fee for filing an application shall be paid at the time
the application is filed with the commissioner. No fee for
filing an application shall be refundable, regardless of whether
the application is approved, denied, or withdrawn.”
“A licensee under this chapter shal! maintain tangible
shareholders’ equity in an amount determined to be adequate
by the commissioner from time to time, but in no event shall
tangible shareholders’ equity be less than five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000). ‘Tangible shareholders’ equity’
means shareholders’ or members’ equity minus intangible
assets as determined in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles.”
“In addition to the fees provided in Section 2038, the
commissioner shall levy an assessment each fiscal year, on a
pro rata basis, on those licensees that at any time during the
preceding calendar year engaged in the business of money
transmission in California in an amount that is, in his or her
Judgment, sufficient to meet the commissioner's expenses in
administering the provisions of this chapter and to provide a
reasonable reserve for contingencies.”Page 7 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page7 of 11
. EXHIBIT BPage 8 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page8 of 11
DFI - Licensees
Waloomea te iftie .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Financial Institutions
fu
U/50
The Money Transmiiter Division of DFI licenses and regulates money transmitters, which includes issuers of payment
instruments (money orders), travelers checks and stored value. The California money transmission laws are found in the
California Financial code, Division 1.2, commencing with section 2000. The full Money Transmission Act can be found
“here: .
Division 1.2. MONEY TRANSMISSION ACT
Chapter 4. General Provisions 2000-2003
Chapter 2. Exemptions 2010-2011
Chapter 3. Licenses 2030-2042
Chapter 4. Agents . 2060-2063
Chapter 5. Eligible Securities 2081-2089
Chapter 6. Consumer Disclosures 2100-2106
Chapter 7. Examinations, Special Reports, and Records 2120-2124
Chapter 8. Additional Enforcement Provisions 2148-2153
Chapter 9. Miscellaneous Provisions 2170-2172
The Department is a member of the Money Transmitter Regulators Association (MTRA).
Information for Applicants for New Money Transmitter or Acquisition of Control of Money Transmitter
Prospective applicants for a money transmitter license pursuant to Financial Code section 2033 and applications for
acquisitions of contro! pursuant to Financial Code section 2035 should thoroughly familiarize themselves with the
relevant sections of the Financial Code and California Code of Regulations, forms and instructions for submitting an
application before attempting to prepare an application, Please refer to the Money Transmitters Forms.
Once the prospective applicant for a new money transmitter license or acquisition of control has become thoroughly
familiar with the laws and regulations that govern this activity, the next step is to arrange for a pre-fiing meeting with the
Money Transmitter Division staff. The prospective applicant should contact Mr. Julio Prada at (415) 263-8540 or by email
at jprada@dfi.ca.gov to arrange for an appointment. The successful applicant will be able to demonstrate a working
knowledge of the laws and regulations that govern money transmitters and be ready to present a proposed business
plan. Meelings are conducted in person at the San Francisco Office. All prospective applicants for a new money
transmitter must have a pre-filing meeting with the Money Transmitter Division staff before filing an application; for
acquisition of control applicants, this step is highly recommended, especially if the applicants are not known to the Money
Transmitter Division staff.
Completed applications for new money transmitter,license, along with the non-refundabte fee of five thousand dollars
($5,000), should be addressed to Mr. Patrick Carroll, Strategic Support Manager, Department of Financial Institutions, 45
Fremont Street, #1700 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219, Contact him at (415) 263-8559 or by email at pcarroll@dfi.ca.goy.
IMPORTANT: Please note that applications submitted by applicants who have not first arranged for a pre-filing meeting
will not be accepted for filing. i
}
lof 2
http://www w.dfisca.gov/licensees/moneytransmitters/Page 9 Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page9 of 11
DFI - Licensees
Completed applications for acquisition of control should also be submitted to Mr. Carroll at the above address along with
the non-refundable fee of three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500).
The supervisory and regulatory staff of the Money Transmitters Division may be reached at the following address:
How To Reach Us
Department of Financial Institutions
45 Fremont Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94105-2219
Phone: (415} 263-8540
Fax: (415) 263-8508
E-mail: Julio Prada, jprada@dfi,ca.qov
-> Callfomia Financial Code Reference
“> Call Report Forms
~» Directory of Money Transmitters
“Division 1.4 Management Certification (Word)
“® Frequently Asked Questions on Division 1.4 (Adobe PDF)
‘» Schedule of Non Affiliates for Division 1.4 Management Certification Form (Excel)
‘» Federal Laws and Requirements Applicable to Money Transmitters
‘» Money Transmitters FAQ
-®% Money Transmitter Forms
‘» Money Transmitters Receipts
> Order Regarding Eligible Securities Ratings and Rating Services — Revised — February 23, 2012 (Adobe PDF)
“% Regulatory and Industry Links
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650 |
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
lI
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page1 of 11
Michael Brooks Carrol! (Bar #54904)
Kevin A. Flautt (Bar #257892)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 788-7600
Facsimile: (415) 421-7379
carroll law@sbeglobal.net
Attomeys for Plaintiff
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Jose Division
THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION, ) Case No, CV11-05496-HRL
Plaintiff, REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN
SUPPORT OF RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION
v. TO MOTION TO DISMISS
ROBERT VENCHIARUTTL, in his official
capacity as Deputy Commissioner of the
California Department of Financial
Institutions; WILLIAM HARATF, in his officia’
capacity as Commissioner of the California
Department of Financial Instibitions; TRACI
STEVENS, in her official capacity as Acting
Secretary of the California Business,
Transportation and Housing Agency: JACOB
A. APPELSMITH, in his official capacity as
Senior Advisor to the Governor of the STATE
OF California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. in
his official capacity as Governor of the State of
California; and KAMALA HARRIS, in her
official capacity as Attorney General of the
State of California,
Before the Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
Hearing Date: March 27, 2012
Hearing Time: 10:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 2
Complaint Filed: November 14, 2011
First Amended Complaint Filed: January 31, 2012
Trial Date: None Set
Detendanis.
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRL
PDF Page 3
306 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
1]
12
13
i4
1S
16
i7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page2 of 11
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 et seq., Plaintiff Think Computer Corporation hereby
requests that this Court take judicial notice of the following exhibits, made up of the statutory, regulatory
and other official instructions and requirements of the Department of Financial Institutions (the “DFI”)
the “FAQ” (frequently asked questions) section as displayed on such administrative agency’s website as
set out below, an official Report issued by the Department of the Treasure concerning the USA Patriot Act,
and certain Rulings of the Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(FinCEN). See United States v. Ritchie (9" Cir. 2003) 342 F.3d 903, 909 (“Courts may take judicial notice
of some public records, including those records and reports of administrative bodies”), Further Plaintiff
requests that this Court take judicial notice of such official documents and publications available on the
DFI and FinCEN websites. “It is not uncommon for courts to take judicial notice of factual information
found on the world wide web." (citations). “This is particularly true of information on government
agency websites, which have often been treated as proper subjects for judicial notice.” (citations
omitted), Paralyzed Veterans of Am. v. McPherson, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69542, *16-18 (N.D. Cal.
Sept. 8, 2008). , s
Accordingly, and pursuant to such authority, Plaintiff requests that the Court take judicial notice of
the following exhibits, true and correct copies of which are attached hereto:
Exhibit A: Statutory, regulatory and other official instructions and requirements of the
Department of Financial Institutions;
Exhibit B: Printout of “FAQ” (frequently asked questions) section as displayed on DFT’S
website;
Exhibit C; “A Report To The Congress In Accordance With Section 359 Of The Uniting And
StF engthening America By Providing Appropriate Tools Required To Intercept And Obstruct
Terrorism Act Of 2001 (USA PATRIOT ACT)” ” submitted by the Secretary of the US.S Department
of the Treasury November 2002;
Exhibit D: Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN
2009-R001;
Exhibit fh; Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN |
2008-R005;
Exhibit F: Department Of The Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Ruling No. FIN
2003-8.
» '
: 2 *
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRL
PDF Page 4
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS CARROLL
300 Montgomery Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94104
10
1
i2
i4
15
16
“17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page3 of 11
Dated: February 28, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL BROOKS
CARROLL
By: 4/ Kevin A. Flautt
Kevin A. Flautt, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff THINK COMPUTER
CORPORATION
}
3 +
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE- Case No. CV11-05496-HRL
PDF Page 5
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page4 of 11
, EXHIBIT A
PDF Page 6
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page5d of 11
EXHIBIT A
Minimum Requirements for Licensure and Fees Established by the
California Money Transmission Act
CA Financial Code
(2012 Re-Numbered) Clause Requirement
§ 2032(b) “An applicant for licensure under this chapter shall pay to the
commissioner a nonrefundable fee of five thousand dollars
($5,000).”
§ 2037(d) “A licensee that sells or issues payment instruments or stored
value shall maintain securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company in an amount of no less than five hundred thousand
dollars ($500,000) or 50 percent of the average daily
outstanding payment instrument and stored value obligations
in California, whichever is greater; provided that such amount
shall not be more than two million dollars ($2,000 ,000).”
§ 2037(e) “A licensee that engages in receiving money for transmission
shall maintain securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company in an amount greater than the average daily
outstanding obligations for money received for transmission in
California, provided that such amount shall not be less than
two hundred fifty thousand doliars ($250,000) nor more than
seven million dollars ($7,000,000).”
§ 2037 “The amount of securities on deposit or a bond of a surety
company required to be maintained by subdivisions (d) and (e)
are cumulative,”
§ 2038(a) “The fee for filing an application for a license is five
thousand dollars ($5,000), as provided in subdivision (b) of
7 Section 2032.”
§ 2038(b) “The fee for filing an application for approval to acquire
control of a licensee is three thousand five hundred dollars
($3,500).
§ 2038(c) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, a licensee
fee of two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500).”
§ 2038(d) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, one
hundred twenty-five dollars ($125) for each licensee branch
office in this state.”
§ 2038(e) “A licensee shall pay annually on or before July 1, twenty-five
dollars ($25) for each agent branch office in this state,”
§ 2038) “Whenever the commissioner examines a licensee or any
agent of a licensee, the licensee shall pay, within 10 days after
receipt of a statement from the commissioner, a fee of seventy-
five dollars ($75) per hour for each examiner engaged in the
examination plus, if it is necessary for any examiner engaged
in the examination to travel outside this state, the travel
expenses of the examiner.”
| : EXHIBIT_PS__
PDF Page 7
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page6 of 11
§ 2038(g)
§ 2038(h)
§ 2040
§ 2042(a)
“Whenever the commissioner examines an applicant, the
applicant shall pay, within 10 days after receipt of a statement
from the commissioner, a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75) per
hour for each examiner engaged in the examination plus, if it
is necessary for any examiner engaged in the examination to
travel outside this state, the travel expenses of the examiner.”
“Each fee for filing an application shall be paid at the time
the application is filed with the commissioner. No fee for
filing an application shall be refundable, regardless of whether
the application is approved, denied, or withdrawn.”
“A licensee under this chapter shal! maintain tangible
shareholders’ equity in an amount determined to be adequate
by the commissioner from time to time, but in no event shall
tangible shareholders’ equity be less than five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000). ‘Tangible shareholders’ equity’
means shareholders’ or members’ equity minus intangible
assets as determined in accordance with United States
generally accepted accounting principles.”
“In addition to the fees provided in Section 2038, the
commissioner shall levy an assessment each fiscal year, on a
pro rata basis, on those licensees that at any time during the
preceding calendar year engaged in the business of money
transmission in California in an amount that is, in his or her
Judgment, sufficient to meet the commissioner's expenses in
administering the provisions of this chapter and to provide a
reasonable reserve for contingencies.”
PDF Page 8
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page7 of 11
. EXHIBIT B
PDF Page 9
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page8 of 11
DFI - Licensees
Waloomea te iftie .
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Financial Institutions
fu
U/50
The Money Transmiiter Division of DFI licenses and regulates money transmitters, which includes issuers of payment
instruments (money orders), travelers checks and stored value. The California money transmission laws are found in the
California Financial code, Division 1.2, commencing with section 2000. The full Money Transmission Act can be found
“here: .
Division 1.2. MONEY TRANSMISSION ACT
Chapter 4. General Provisions 2000-2003
Chapter 2. Exemptions 2010-2011
Chapter 3. Licenses 2030-2042
Chapter 4. Agents . 2060-2063
Chapter 5. Eligible Securities 2081-2089
Chapter 6. Consumer Disclosures 2100-2106
Chapter 7. Examinations, Special Reports, and Records 2120-2124
Chapter 8. Additional Enforcement Provisions 2148-2153
Chapter 9. Miscellaneous Provisions 2170-2172
The Department is a member of the Money Transmitter Regulators Association (MTRA).
Information for Applicants for New Money Transmitter or Acquisition of Control of Money Transmitter
Prospective applicants for a money transmitter license pursuant to Financial Code section 2033 and applications for
acquisitions of contro! pursuant to Financial Code section 2035 should thoroughly familiarize themselves with the
relevant sections of the Financial Code and California Code of Regulations, forms and instructions for submitting an
application before attempting to prepare an application, Please refer to the Money Transmitters Forms.
Once the prospective applicant for a new money transmitter license or acquisition of control has become thoroughly
familiar with the laws and regulations that govern this activity, the next step is to arrange for a pre-fiing meeting with the
Money Transmitter Division staff. The prospective applicant should contact Mr. Julio Prada at (415) 263-8540 or by email
at jprada@dfi.ca.gov to arrange for an appointment. The successful applicant will be able to demonstrate a working
knowledge of the laws and regulations that govern money transmitters and be ready to present a proposed business
plan. Meelings are conducted in person at the San Francisco Office. All prospective applicants for a new money
transmitter must have a pre-filing meeting with the Money Transmitter Division staff before filing an application; for
acquisition of control applicants, this step is highly recommended, especially if the applicants are not known to the Money
Transmitter Division staff.
Completed applications for new money transmitter,license, along with the non-refundabte fee of five thousand dollars
($5,000), should be addressed to Mr. Patrick Carroll, Strategic Support Manager, Department of Financial Institutions, 45
Fremont Street, #1700 San Francisco, CA 94105-2219, Contact him at (415) 263-8559 or by email at pcarroll@dfi.ca.goy.
IMPORTANT: Please note that applications submitted by applicants who have not first arranged for a pre-filing meeting
will not be accepted for filing. i
}
lof 2
http://www w.dfisca.gov/licensees/moneytransmitters/
Case5:11-cv-05496-HRL Document28 Filed02/29/12 Page10 of 11
DFI - Resources
Walcoma te the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Dépariment of Financial Institutions
i - t
http://Awww.dfi.ca.gov/resources/faqs/faqs_tms.asp ‘ lof2
Third party AI contribution in government documents
Possible
Document content is reproduced directly from government sources. Think Computer Corporation does not generate, alter, annotate, or summarize documents using artificial intelligence. Some filings in our database may themselves contain AI-generated content submitted by third parties to government agencies.
Back to 
